2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of visibility and diagnostic capability of noninvasive coronary angiography by eight-slice multidetector-row computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, our results are very similar to those obtained in the few available comparisons between MSCT and MRI (13,14). Third, in the present study, 14% of coronary segments were uninterpretable, which is in line with previous studies (6,11,22). However, with the introduction of 32-and 64-slice systems, the percentage of uninterpretable segments is likely to decline further.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Functionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Still, our results are very similar to those obtained in the few available comparisons between MSCT and MRI (13,14). Third, in the present study, 14% of coronary segments were uninterpretable, which is in line with previous studies (6,11,22). However, with the introduction of 32-and 64-slice systems, the percentage of uninterpretable segments is likely to decline further.…”
Section: Left Ventricular Functionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar percentages have been reported previously. 13,19,27 In the near future, however, this limitation may be overcome by the introduction of 32-detector and 64-detector row scanners in combination with faster rotation times, which are likely to reduce the percentage of nonassessable segments. Second, an important drawback of MSCT is the radiation dose that is still considerably high: Ϸ8 mSv.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Recent reports have suggested that CTA with MDCT in the field of cardiology exhibits sufficiently high diagnostic capability compared with conventional angiography. 29,30 Therefore, CTA may be a helpful diagnostic tool in the field of rheumatology, such as in the diagnosis of vasculitic syndromes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%