1988
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/45.11.2361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Visual and Turbidimetric Methods for Determining Short-term Compatibility of Intravenous Critical-care Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical compatibility was confirmed using a previously defined visualization method 7 and is similar to previously published results. 5 Although this portion of the study was blinded, it was limited by 1 factor: an extended time course of 72 hours where observers were asked to identify incompatibilities based, in part, on color change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Physical compatibility was confirmed using a previously defined visualization method 7 and is similar to previously published results. 5 Although this portion of the study was blinded, it was limited by 1 factor: an extended time course of 72 hours where observers were asked to identify incompatibilities based, in part, on color change.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The absorbance light was scanned at 550 nm. The absorbance of more than 0.010 AU was considered as evidence of turbidity, providing a quantitative determination of incompatibility 14. An absorbance reading less than 0.010 AU was considered to be a noise level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pH change of ≥1.0 was set a priori as compared with the time 0 or comparator solution as an indication of physical incompatibility based on several previously published studies. [6][7][8][9]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%