Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses

Kawamura, Junya; Tanabe, Hirotaka; Shojo, Tomohiro; Yamauchi, Tomofusa; Takase, Kosuke; Tabuchi, Hitoshi

doi:10.1038/s41598-024-55926-5

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

(61 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At all distances, high spectacle independence was observed, with 37.5% of patients reporting photic phenomena [ 13 ]. In a larger Japanese study by Kawamura et al of 122 eyes implanted with this new IOL compared to 1326 eyes with a diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and contrast sensitivity with glare were significantly better in the Panoptix group [ 14 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical results with a multifocal intraocular lens with a novel optical design

Goldman

2024

BMC Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To evaluate the optical performance and safety of a new multifocal lens with a novel optical design featuring two additional foci (or intensifiers) in patients with cataract and presbyopia. Methods In this single-center, non-randomized prospective observational study, 31 patients underwent implantation of the new multifocal IOL between March 2020 and November 2021 at a tertiary clinical center in Buenos Aires and Ramos Mejia, Argentina. Postoperative examinations with emphasis on uncorrected and corrected visual acuity at distance and near and at two different intermediate distances (80 cm and 60 cm) were performed during the 3 postoperative months. Results Of the 31 patients who underwent implantation of the new IOL, 30 underwent bilateral surgery (61 eyes in total). At 3 months, all 61 eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) of at least 0.15 logMAR; 57 eyes (93%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) of 0.1 logMAR and 27 eyes (44%) had an UCDVA of 0.0 logMAR. At 80 cm, 60 eyes (98%) had an uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA) of at least 0.1 log MAR and 48 eyes (79%) had an UCIVA of 0.0 logMAR. Conclusion The new multifocal IOL with a novel optical concept (5 foci) showed a wide range of visual acuity especially at intermediate and near distances in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Uncorrected visual acuity was excellent at all tested distances, monocularly and binocularly, spectacle independence and patient satisfaction were high.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical results with a multifocal intraocular lens with a novel optical design

Goldman

2024

BMC Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Secondary sulcus IOL implantation for presbyopia correction following Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Zimmermann,

Peixoto,

Biluca

et al. 2024

American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Yang,

Li,

Zou

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study compares the optical quality of zonal refractive multifocal and diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and visual outcomes after implantation in 93 patients(93 eyes) with cataracts and high myopia. A retrospective analysis was conducted to measure visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curves, wavefront aberrations, modulation transfer function (MTF), a Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV) and visual quality self-evaluation were examined at 3 months. The results demonstrated the ZMB group showed better uncorrected near visual acuity ( P < 0.01), and the MF15 group showed better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity ( P < 0.001). The ZMB group provided better MTF than the MF15 group ( P < 0.01) but demonstrated a worse QoV score, especially for the severity of glare, halo, and starburst ( P < 0.05). The satisfaction score and spectacle independence rate in the ZMB group were higher than in the MF15 group ( P < 0.01). LS-313MF15 and TecnisZMB00 offered excellent visual restoration, stable distance visual acuity, and good subjective visual function.

show abstract

Comparison of visual performance between diffractive bifocal and diffractive trifocal intraocular lenses

Cited by 5 publications

References 37 publications

Clinical results with a multifocal intraocular lens with a novel optical design

Clinical results with a multifocal intraocular lens with a novel optical design

Secondary sulcus IOL implantation for presbyopia correction following Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Comparison of visual outcomes in patients with cataracts and high myopia after implantation of a zonal refractive multifocal or diffractive bifocal intraocular lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About