2011 34th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2011.6043710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Vocal Tract Length Normalization technique applied for clean and noisy speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…practically unchanged. 4 Adding the proposed LB-ABE (approach LBUB-ABE) improves the AMR condition by −5.15 dB in LB-LSD, which corresponds to an improvement of −5.15 dB/(300 − 0) Hz • 100 = −1.72 dB per 100 Hz, thus exhibiting more than 4 times the restoring capabilities as compared to the UB-ABE approach.…”
Section: A Instrumental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…practically unchanged. 4 Adding the proposed LB-ABE (approach LBUB-ABE) improves the AMR condition by −5.15 dB in LB-LSD, which corresponds to an improvement of −5.15 dB/(300 − 0) Hz • 100 = −1.72 dB per 100 Hz, thus exhibiting more than 4 times the restoring capabilities as compared to the UB-ABE approach.…”
Section: A Instrumental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In summary, test condition 4 shows that each speaker, male and female, takes profit from an LB extension. On average over speakers, LB extension improves the speech quality by a significant 0.26 CMOS points.…”
Section: Subjective Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations