2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4995905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of volatility function technique for risk-neutral densities estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout the recent literature, there are papers using semiparametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating implied probability distribution (Breeden & Litzenberger, 2014;Datta, Londono, & Ross, 2017;Malz, 2014;Smith, 2012;Tavin, 2011), some of them are comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches (Aparicio & Hodges, 1998;Mizrach, 2010;Xiao & Zhou, 2017), while several are dealing with parametric (Arneri c et al, 2015;Cheng, 2010;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Grith & Kr€ atschmer, 2011;Khrapov, 2014;S€ oderlind, 2000;V€ ah€ amaa, 2005) or nonparametric approaches only (Andersen & Wagener, 2002;Bahaludin & Abdullah, 2017;Figlewski, 2009;Grith, H€ ardle, & Schienle, 2011;Jackwerth & Rubinstein, 1996). There are only few papers that compare various non-structural models for implied probability distribution estimation (Bliss & Panigirtzoglou, 2002;Coutant et al, 2001;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Jackwerth, 1999;Jondeau et al, 2007;Jondeau & Rockinger, 2000;Santos & Guerra, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Throughout the recent literature, there are papers using semiparametric and nonparametric approaches for estimating implied probability distribution (Breeden & Litzenberger, 2014;Datta, Londono, & Ross, 2017;Malz, 2014;Smith, 2012;Tavin, 2011), some of them are comparing parametric and nonparametric approaches (Aparicio & Hodges, 1998;Mizrach, 2010;Xiao & Zhou, 2017), while several are dealing with parametric (Arneri c et al, 2015;Cheng, 2010;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Grith & Kr€ atschmer, 2011;Khrapov, 2014;S€ oderlind, 2000;V€ ah€ amaa, 2005) or nonparametric approaches only (Andersen & Wagener, 2002;Bahaludin & Abdullah, 2017;Figlewski, 2009;Grith, H€ ardle, & Schienle, 2011;Jackwerth & Rubinstein, 1996). There are only few papers that compare various non-structural models for implied probability distribution estimation (Bliss & Panigirtzoglou, 2002;Coutant et al, 2001;Gemmill & Saflekos, 2000;Jackwerth, 1999;Jondeau et al, 2007;Jondeau & Rockinger, 2000;Santos & Guerra, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way the out-ofsample performances of the three non-structural models are compared using MSE and DM test. Comparison of the first moments of the distribution and the spot prices at the expiration date of the option, i.e., the forecasting performances, is performed in only few papers (Arneri c et al, 2015;Bahaludin & Abdullah, 2017;Benavides & Mora, 2008), while forecasting accuracy via updated mean and variance on the next trading day is given only in Gemmil and Saflekos (2000). Therefore, literature lacks papers that compare RNDs for forecasting purposes in general and especially for comparison of different non-structural approaches and for different maturity horizons.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%