2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-020-01680-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Volume Retention and Biocompatibility of Acellular Dermal Matrix/Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Autologous Fat Grafts in a Mouse Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 13 HA/MADM can also promote adipocyte survival via increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression 14 and showed higher volume retention than the fat graft in a mouse model. 16 Considering the pathogenesis of HIV-associated FLA, including reduced adipogenesis and increased adipocyte apoptosis, 5 HA/MADM may have an advantage over other filler materials by recovering the patient’s own adipose tissue. Limitations of our study include the relatively small sample size, absence of a control group, and lack of female patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 HA/MADM can also promote adipocyte survival via increased vascular endothelial growth factor expression 14 and showed higher volume retention than the fat graft in a mouse model. 16 Considering the pathogenesis of HIV-associated FLA, including reduced adipogenesis and increased adipocyte apoptosis, 5 HA/MADM may have an advantage over other filler materials by recovering the patient’s own adipose tissue. Limitations of our study include the relatively small sample size, absence of a control group, and lack of female patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest the article entitled ''Comparison of Volume Retention and Biocompatibility of Acellular Dermal Matrix/Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Autologous Fat Grafts in a Mouse Model'' by Kim et al [1] in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. In this article, the authors compared the volume retention and biocompatibility of acellular dermal matrix/hyaluronic acid filler (ADM/HA) with fat grafts.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%