2009
DOI: 10.1186/1532-429x-11-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. Methods:We performed CMR and echo in 52 patients with first AMI shortly after primary angioplasty and four months thereafter. CMR included cine-MR and T1-weighted first-pass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percentage of recovery in ventricular function was assessed according to whether ≥30% recovery in regional wall thickening was observed after PCI. 28,29 Using this characterization, receiver-operator characteristic analysis was performed to determine a cutoff value with maximal diagnostic accuracy for diastolic microcirculatory wave intensity (BEW) and hMR, in predicting regional recovery in function, with the difference between the 2 indices assessed using the Delong receiver-operator characteristic comparison analysis. 30 Data are presented as median with 25% to 75% interquartile ranges, unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percentage of recovery in ventricular function was assessed according to whether ≥30% recovery in regional wall thickening was observed after PCI. 28,29 Using this characterization, receiver-operator characteristic analysis was performed to determine a cutoff value with maximal diagnostic accuracy for diastolic microcirculatory wave intensity (BEW) and hMR, in predicting regional recovery in function, with the difference between the 2 indices assessed using the Delong receiver-operator characteristic comparison analysis. 30 Data are presented as median with 25% to 75% interquartile ranges, unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations seem drastic in the current era and may reflect the use of a former-generation echo machine. As one might expect, the differences were mostly marked between 2D echocardiography and CMR in the postinfarct population, 11 where the role of CMR as a fundamentally 3-dimensional (3D) approach led to estimation of a lower EF (44±12% versus 51±8%), although this may have been accentuated by somewhat earlier performance of CMR (2.8±1.6 versus 3.4±1.7 days after infarction). In a recent meta-analysis, 12 end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were underestimated by 2D echocardiography by 48.2±55.9 and 27.7±45.7 mL, respectively, although the bias for EF was small (0.1±13.9%).…”
Section: Accuracy and Validitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Late enhancement (LE) CMR images were acquired by using an ECG-triggered phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) single shot TrueFISP sequence with consecutive short-axis slices, as described in detail previously [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Cmr Protocol and Image Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%