The significance of crop evapotranspiration (ETa) to climate science, agronomic research, and water resources is not in dispute. What continues to draw attention is how variability in ETa is driven by changing environments, abiotic stresses, and management practices. Here, the impacts of elevated CO2 concentration (e[CO2]), elevated ozone concentration (e[O3]), warming, abiotic stresses (water, salinity, heat stresses), and management practices (planting density, irrigation methods, mulching, nitrogen application) on cropland ETa were reviewed, along with their possible causes and estimation. Water and salinity stresses, e[O3], and drip irrigation adoption generally led to lower total growing–season ETa. However, total growing–season ETa responses to e[CO2], warming, heat stress, mulching, planting density, and nitrogen supplement appear inconsistent across empirical studies. The effects of e[CO2], e[O3], water and salinity stresses on total growing–season ETa are attributed to their influence on stomatal conductance, root water uptake, root and leaf area development, microclimate, and potentially phenology. Total growing–season ETa in response to warming is affected by variations in ambient growing–season mean air temperature and phenology. The differences in crop ETa under varying planting densities are due to their differences in leaf area. The responses of ETa to heat stress, mulching, and nitrogen application represent trade–off between their opposite effects on transpiration and evaporation, along with possibly phenology. Modified ETa models currently in use can estimate the response of ETa to the many aforementioned factors except for e[O3], heat stress, and nitrogen application. These factors offer a blueprint for future research inquiries.