2008
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-26-3693-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wind measurements in the troposphere and mesosphere by VHF/MF radars and in-situ techniques

Abstract: Abstract. Radar wind observations at frequencies between 1.98 and 53.5 MHz obtained at polar latitudes were compared to in-situ wind measurements by radiosondes at tropospheric altitudes and to winds from falling spheres at mesospheric altitudes. Comparisons are shown for several campaigns of radiosonde and falling sphere observations. The radar wind directions agree well to the radiosonde and falling sphere observations and are highly correlated. The winds estimated from radar measurements are less than the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, clearly showing an excellent agreement between both data sets at 82-84 km, but also indicating differences at altitudes above 85 km where the MF radar winds tend to be smaller than those recorded by the meteor radars. Similar results are known from other investigations (for details see also Hocking and Thayaparan, 1997;Manson et al, 2004;Jacobi et al, 2009;Engler et al, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Data and Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1, clearly showing an excellent agreement between both data sets at 82-84 km, but also indicating differences at altitudes above 85 km where the MF radar winds tend to be smaller than those recorded by the meteor radars. Similar results are known from other investigations (for details see also Hocking and Thayaparan, 1997;Manson et al, 2004;Jacobi et al, 2009;Engler et al, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Data and Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Engler et al (2008) have presented a recent, relatively comprehensive, comparison of Doppler and Spaced Antenna methods compared to in situ methods like falling spheres and radiosondes. In general they find that the various methods agree well in direction, but with some scatter, while the radar method seems to underestimate the in situ methods by typically 10-30%, with the Doppler methods having less serious discrepancies.…”
Section: Compatibility Of Radar Wind Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general at heights above about 85-90 km MF radars record significantly weaker winds than meteor radars. Engler et al (2008) estimated the winds measured by MF radar in the upper mesosphere to be too small by anywhere between 20-40%. Similar results have been found by, e.g., Stubbs (1973), Cervera and Reid (1995), Hocking and Thyaparan (1997), Manson et al (2004), Jacobi et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%