2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of wood density in roots and stems of black spruce before and after commercial thinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Amoah et al (2012) investigated the physical and mechanical properties of branch, stem, and root wood from the tropical trees Iroko (Milicia excelsa) and Emire (Terminalia ivorensis) and concluded that the root woods of both species exhibited the highest basic densities compared with those of branch and trunk. The same results were obtained by Lemay et al (2018), who showed that the density of the root wood of the black spruce (Picea mariana) was higher than that of the trunk wood. These authors argued that the greater density protects the xylem of the roots, which present higher hydraulic stress, thereby avoiding the PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Amoah et al (2012) investigated the physical and mechanical properties of branch, stem, and root wood from the tropical trees Iroko (Milicia excelsa) and Emire (Terminalia ivorensis) and concluded that the root woods of both species exhibited the highest basic densities compared with those of branch and trunk. The same results were obtained by Lemay et al (2018), who showed that the density of the root wood of the black spruce (Picea mariana) was higher than that of the trunk wood. These authors argued that the greater density protects the xylem of the roots, which present higher hydraulic stress, thereby avoiding the PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE bioresources.com .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Fortunel et al (2014), Amoah et al (2012), andVurdu (1977) are examples of these studies. This lack of research is primarily because of the difficulty of accessing roots and the lack of commercial interest (Fortunel et al 2014;Lemay et al 2018). Because of this knowledge gap, the properties of roots are generally assumed to be equivalent to those of the trunk; however, this assumption may be incorrect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the tree ring, the increasing proportion of cell wall per cell diameter describes the general pattern of tree‐ring density, which culminates in latewood (Preston et al ., 2006; Björklund et al ., 2017). A higher micro‐density, produced from an increasing wall/lumen ratio, mirrors changes in the proportion of carbon invested, on the one hand, to promote cell enlargement and primary wall expansion and, on the other hand, to synthesize secondary wall components (Deslauriers et al ., 2016; Lemay et al ., 2017). During tracheid differentiation, carbon is required primarily to sustain cell expansion, preventing cell lysis through the deposition of an extensible primary wall, which is able to contain the high amount of water needed to maintain turgor pressure for enlargement (Steppe et al ., 2015; Zarra et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More serious with respect to our goal of comparing wood density across age groups would be a case where the specific gravity of wood added by individual trees changes as the trees age. Investigations into this question, though, have shown wood density to vary only slightly as a function of tree age and factors such as competition that may co-vary with tree age [30,31]. Treating WSG as a constant also ignores variation that may occur across ecological gradients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%