Comparison of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography Scan in the Evaluation of Knee Trauma

Abstract

Background and objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the accuracy of X-ray (XR) imaging according to computed tomography (CT) scanning in the diagnosis of knee bone fractures, and in the determination of fracture characteristics, and to identify CT scan indications in patients with knee trauma. Materials and methods: The patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) due to knee trauma between January 2017 and December 2018 and who underwent XR imaging and CT scans were included in the study. XR images were reinterpreted by an emergency physician. The official reports, which had been interpreted by a radiologist in the hospital automation system for CT images, were considered valid. Results: Five hundred and forty-eight patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 200 (36.5%) had fractures in XR imaging and 208 (38.0%) had fractures in CT scans. Compared to CT scanning, XR imaging was found to have 89% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value in identifying the fracture. The sensitivity of XR imaging in identifying growth plate fracture, angulation, stepping off, and extension of the fracture into the joint space was determined as 78% and less. According to the kappa value, there was determined a perfect concordance between the XR imaging and CT scans in angulation, stepping off, and extension of the fracture into the joint space. This concordance was moderate in growth plate fractures. Conclusions: XR imaging has a low sensitivity in identifying knee fractures. There is a moderate concordance between XR imaging and CT scanning in identifying growth plate fractures. Therefore, CT scanning should be performed in patients whose fracture type and fracture characteristics are not able to be determined exactly with XR imaging in knee injury.

Application of Low-Dose CT and MRI in the Evaluation of Soft Tissue Injury in Tibial Plateau Fractures

“…For example, the diagnosis effect is not comprehensive enough in the face of occult illness or complicated symptoms, and it has certain harm to the human body due to radiation. In addition, the anatomical resolution of X-ray is low due to the overlapping of the patient's bone structures [ 4 ]. Especially when the fracture plane is an inclined plane and the articular surface of the tibial plateau collapses, the tissue overlap will lead to the inability to accurately and effectively distinguish the joint injury [ 5 ].…”

Response to Letter to the Editor: Validation of standing cone beam computed tomography for diagnosing subchondral fetlock pathology in the Thoroughbred racehorse

“…However, Dr Ramzan's apparent suggestion that radiography is equal to CT or sufficient for the detection of subtle fracture or bone density change is flatly unsupported by the human literature, where a plethora of publications demonstrate the improved sensitivity, specificity and characterisation of fracture identification in various body parts 3–10 . Would this not also reasonably apply to equine CT as it does in human imaging?…”

Report of a Rare Case of Focal Depressed Fracture of the Tibia in an Adult

“…However, in the context of pathological fractures, radiographs are insufficient to plan adequate interventions. CT scan can give a more precise analysis of the cortex, periosteum, and trabeculae [ 8 ]. MRI is known to be better for studying soft tissue and bone marrow.…”