2021 18th European Radar Conference (EuRAD) 2022
DOI: 10.23919/eurad50154.2022.9784509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ZF and MF filters through PSLR and ISLR assessment in automotive OFDM radar

Abstract: Many filtering strategies can be applied to estimate target position along the range profile in orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing radar. Chief among these filters are the matched filter (MF) and the zero forcing (ZF) method. For each technique, this paper compares the impact on the peak to side lobe ratio (PSLR) and the integrated side lobe ratio (ISLR). The results show that ZF scores higher than MF with respect to PSLR and ISLR in low-noise environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and the power of the constellations is normalised to 1. Some numerical values of the constellation parameters are given in [28]. The number of considered OFDM symbols in a frame is 1, since there is no slow time radar signal processing in our analysis.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and the power of the constellations is normalised to 1. Some numerical values of the constellation parameters are given in [28]. The number of considered OFDM symbols in a frame is 1, since there is no slow time radar signal processing in our analysis.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. The simulation results are given by (28) and the analytical ones are obtained with Proposition 11. The curves confirm 1) The accuracy of our analytical developments;…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle is to divide the received symbols A r (µN c + n) by the emitted symbols A(µN c + n) to recover the impulse response of the propagation channel carrying the target range and Doppler information. This method shows better performances in terms of peak-to-sidelobe ratio than the traditional matched filtering [21]. The frequency domain channel function transfer is so…”
Section: B Ofdm Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take dc = 1 for FMCW radar. The current automotive corner radar range resolution requires ∆R = 0.3 m which leads to N c = 334 according to (21) for OFDM. This corresponds to a signal bandwidth of 500.67 MHz like for FMCW Finally, a velocity resolution ∆V = 0.15 m s −1 is suitable for the automotive radar applications.…”
Section: A Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that N is large enough to verify . However, this first approximation is not tight enough, as shown in [5]. We then need to use the second order.…”
Section: Received Signal With Conventional Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%