2016
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1509126469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Zinc,Vitamin A &D Serum Levels Between Children With Respiratory Tract Infection And Healthy Individuals in two Iranian Referral Hospitals

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies currently available in the literature are burdened by a lack of reproducibility, methodological imprecision, low population size and the heterogeneity of the population studied and of the results obtained, so it is not possible to recommend the use of trace elements in the prevention of RRIs. In response to the outcome about the possible relationship between reduced serum levels of vitamin D/ vitamin A/ vitamin E and increased risk of RRIs in children, 7 observational studies of very low methodological quality and with very heterogeneous results were included [ 53 – 56 , 58 , 59 , 69 ]. The outcomes are different: 3 studies [ 54 , 56 , 59 ] enrolled subjects with RRIs, 1 study [ 55 ] selected subjects with AOM, 1 study [ 53 ] with recurrent tonsillitis, and, lastly, Shokrollahi’s study assessed subjects with lower respiratory tract infections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies currently available in the literature are burdened by a lack of reproducibility, methodological imprecision, low population size and the heterogeneity of the population studied and of the results obtained, so it is not possible to recommend the use of trace elements in the prevention of RRIs. In response to the outcome about the possible relationship between reduced serum levels of vitamin D/ vitamin A/ vitamin E and increased risk of RRIs in children, 7 observational studies of very low methodological quality and with very heterogeneous results were included [ 53 – 56 , 58 , 59 , 69 ]. The outcomes are different: 3 studies [ 54 , 56 , 59 ] enrolled subjects with RRIs, 1 study [ 55 ] selected subjects with AOM, 1 study [ 53 ] with recurrent tonsillitis, and, lastly, Shokrollahi’s study assessed subjects with lower respiratory tract infections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%