2016 2nd International Conference on Communication Control and Intelligent Systems (CCIS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ccintels.2016.7878222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison on behavior of different faults in fuzzy logic and PID controlled switched reluctance motor drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuzzy logic control is suitable for dealing with the system with high nonlinearity by fuzzification and defuzzification processes. Compared with the PID control method for SRM drives, fuzzy logic control schemes exhibit better speed dynamic response and lower torque ripple in the faulty case [77]. Fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) with adaptive tracking ability is derived for sensor faults and Lyapunov functions are adopted to analyze the system stability [78].…”
Section: ) Fuzzy Logic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy logic control is suitable for dealing with the system with high nonlinearity by fuzzification and defuzzification processes. Compared with the PID control method for SRM drives, fuzzy logic control schemes exhibit better speed dynamic response and lower torque ripple in the faulty case [77]. Fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) with adaptive tracking ability is derived for sensor faults and Lyapunov functions are adopted to analyze the system stability [78].…”
Section: ) Fuzzy Logic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its robustness and high reliability, the VRM is subject to several faults that can affect the mechanical, electrical and control parts or possibly combined faults [7,8]. The VRM is exposed to various and varied faults such as: static and dynamic eccentricity [9], short-circuit fault between turns and shortcircuit between phases, bearing faults, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%