2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icicct.2018.8473195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison on Luo and Ultra Luo Converter for Power Factor Correction in BLDC Motor Drive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…170 2 850 1 0.2 × 20, 000 300 170 2 + 300 = 4.71 mH (16) where R in defines the input resistance of the PFC converter seen by the flyback converter. The input inductor is selected as 5 mH such that the input current remains continuous during the entire range of switching period.…”
Section: Design Of Non-inverting Pfc Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…170 2 850 1 0.2 × 20, 000 300 170 2 + 300 = 4.71 mH (16) where R in defines the input resistance of the PFC converter seen by the flyback converter. The input inductor is selected as 5 mH such that the input current remains continuous during the entire range of switching period.…”
Section: Design Of Non-inverting Pfc Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buck-boost converter offers reliable solution for the battery charger at sudden varying supply voltage due to both stepping up and stepping down characteristics. A number of PFC converters based on DBR fed and bridgeless (BL) buck-boost configuration such as zeta, single-ended-primary-inductance converter (SEPIC) and Cuk converters, are comprehended in [12][13][14][15][16]. However, the zeta, as well as SEPIC PFC topologies, faces the limitation of discontinuous input current and discontinuous output current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%