2017
DOI: 10.11591/ijpeds.v8.i4.pp1682-1692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Performances of Indirect Field Oriented Control for Three-Phase Induction Motor Drives

Abstract: This paper presents the comparative performances of Indirect Field Oriented Control (IFOC) for the three-phase induction motor. Recently, the interest of widely used the induction motor at industries because of reliability, ruggedness and almost free in maintenance. Thus, the IFOC scheme is employed to control the speed of induction motor. Therefore, P and PI controllers based on IFOC approach are analyzed at differences speed commands with no load condition. On the other hand, the PI controller is tuned based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous research, the motor speed regulation was carried out using IFOC with a comparison of P and PI control with static conditions and no load. From this research, it was found that in static conditions no-load speed response using P and PI control at low-speed chattering and oscillation occurred [13]. Besides, other research related to the transient response characteristics of a 3-phase induction motor with a control vector using a PI controller, carried out in high-speed static conditions obtained good transient response characteristics when tested for changes in speed with a steady-state error ranging from 1-1.9% [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In previous research, the motor speed regulation was carried out using IFOC with a comparison of P and PI control with static conditions and no load. From this research, it was found that in static conditions no-load speed response using P and PI control at low-speed chattering and oscillation occurred [13]. Besides, other research related to the transient response characteristics of a 3-phase induction motor with a control vector using a PI controller, carried out in high-speed static conditions obtained good transient response characteristics when tested for changes in speed with a steady-state error ranging from 1-1.9% [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Salahsatu cara untuk meningkatkan performa dari motor induksi adalah dengan mengendalikan kecepatan motor induksi. Banyak teknik kontrol yang digunakan untuk mengatur kecepatan motor induksi berdasarkan metode IFOC termasuk kontrol konvensional seperi kontrol proportional integral (PI) dan teknik kontrol proportional integral derivative (PID) [5]. Teknik kontrol konvensional dianggap sebagai teknik yang baik karena desainnya mudah digunakan, biaya rendah dengan struktur sederhana.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The artificial neural network is shown in figure 3. Table 1 shows the classification results for each of the sensor locations using the first 9 input features (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). The test achievement was higher with SVMs in all cases aside from flag 3 where both were at  ISSN:2502-4752 Indonesian J Elec Eng & Comp Sci, Vol.…”
Section: Proposed Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional Integral Estimator of the Stator Resistance for Direct Torque Control Induction Motor Drive is discussed in [8]. Comparison Performances of Indirect Field Oriented Control for Three-Phase Induction Motor Drives is presented in [9]. Sensor less Control of BLDC Motor using Fuzzy logic controller for Solar power Generation is discussed in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%