Comparison study for internal and external modes of fixation for fractures of distal end radius

Abstract

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">Fractures of the distal radius continue to be one of the most common skeletal injuries. The methods which are commonly practiced are closed manipulation and plaster cast, pins and plaster, percutaneous pinning, external fixation and open reduction and internal fixation with or without bone graft. Surgeons are increasingly faced with the dilemma of when to consider operative management and when cast immobilization is the optimal treatment.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">47 cases of distal end radius fractures were operated in the orthopedic department of a tertiary care centre. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results of external and internal fixation methods for the treatment of fractures of distal end of radius. Patients operated by external fixation were classified as Group A and those operated by internal fixation were classified as group B. Patients were classified according to AO Classification. Patients were followed at regular intervals depending on the case and time of operation and evaluated by Gartland and Werley score</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">In our study, 29 patients were of extraarticular type, of which 86.20% had an excellent score and 18 patients were of intraarticular type, of which 83.33% had an excellent score. But when compared to groups A and B, the percentage of excellent score obtained in group B was more than that in group A in both extraarticular and intraarticular fractures. Yuan-kun et al did a study on intraarticular distal end radius fractures and evaluated the patients by Gartland and Werley point system, concluding that plating gives better results than external fixation supplemented by K wiring. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-IN">We concluded that no method of fixation can be said superior to the other. Each method has fracture-specific indication. The results of open reduction and internal fixation can be better than external fixation in initial months, but in the long run, both the methods can have excellent score, provided the fixation is good and properly indicated.</span></p>

Finite Element Analysis Study of Prototype of a Novel Intramedullary Injectable Bioresorbable Polymer Fixator versus a Volar Plate for Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

“…Examples are cast immobilization only; closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires only; and open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate, dorsal locking plate, percutaneous Kirschner wires in combination with a non-bridging cross-pin fixator, a system comprising an expandable intramedullary cage and fragment-specific screw fixation, intramedullary nailing, or a photodynamic system (comprising a light-curable polymer contained in an inflatable balloon catheter) [3] [4] [5]. For a given fracture type, there is lack of consensus on the optimal treatment modality [4] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Nonetheless, for certain types, the volar locking plate is very widely used [6] [7] [8].…”