2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison study of hydrolytic degradation behaviors between α′- and α-poly( l -lactide)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N. Zangg et. all demonstrated different hydrolytic degradation behaviour of α′- and α-PLLA 22 . Thus it is quite important to control the polymorphism for optimizing the properties of PLLA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…N. Zangg et. all demonstrated different hydrolytic degradation behaviour of α′- and α-PLLA 22 . Thus it is quite important to control the polymorphism for optimizing the properties of PLLA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is important for the application of composites in regenerative medicine as bone scaffolds. The crystal form of PLLA significantly affects the mechanical properties and exhibits different hydrolytic degradation behavior [ 42 , 43 , 44 ]. For PLLGA, which has lower crystallization ability than PLLA, nucleation of melt crystallization was achieved only by HAP modified with PEG2100, whereas cold crystallization was enhanced by HAP modified with PEG2100 and PEG600.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential criticism of the test method that it was conducted in a water bath given that it is known that hydrolysis and water absorption of PLLA can have a major effect on the mechanical properties [49][50][51][52]. However it should be noted that the timescale of the experiment is orders of magnitude smaller than the timescale for hydrolysis to have an influence [53][54][55][56][57]. To verify this, additional experiments have been performed where PLLA tubing was uniaxially stretched after heating in a wet environment for 8 min (similar to the timescale of the experiments in this paper) and after heating in a dry environment with no significant difference observed [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%