2017
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2017.2658567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Study of Noncontact Vital Signs Detection Using a Doppler Stepped-Frequency Continuous-Wave Radar and Camera-Based Imaging Photoplethysmography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, numerous non-contact vital sign measurement systems, such as ultrasonic proximity sensors [ 1 ], infrared thermography [ 2 ], cameras and life radars [ 3 , 4 ], have been implemented for respiration or heartbeat monitoring. Given its intrinsic advantages, such as robustness to light, temperature and sound, life radar is more reliable for applications in such imperfect surroundings as hospital wards and the home environment [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, numerous non-contact vital sign measurement systems, such as ultrasonic proximity sensors [ 1 ], infrared thermography [ 2 ], cameras and life radars [ 3 , 4 ], have been implemented for respiration or heartbeat monitoring. Given its intrinsic advantages, such as robustness to light, temperature and sound, life radar is more reliable for applications in such imperfect surroundings as hospital wards and the home environment [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the cardiac and respiratory rates showed an error of less than 2%. An experiment was performed to evaluate the performance of an SFCW radar for measuring the vital signs of an individual at different body orientations in [149]. Despite having better performances at the front and back positions, the radar exhibits errors of no more than 2% for all the four positions.…”
Section: Biomedical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more convenient technology is ballistocardiography 7,8 , which however is restricted to bed-ridden persons and standardized conditions. Further options of continuous monitoring comprise more complex devices such as infrared camera-based systems, which however requires several markers on the person 9 , and distance-measuring devices such as laser- [10][11][12] or radar-based [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] systems. When comparing the latter two, radar systems have the advantage that they are able to penetrate clothing and allow for a very comfortable way of continuous and contactless vital sign monitoring.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%