2015
DOI: 10.1541/ieejjia.4.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Study of Various Motors for EVs and the Potentiality of a Ferrite Magnet Motor

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison study of various motors for application to an electric vehicle (EV) and the potentiality of a ferrite magnet motor as a candidate for rare-earth-less motor for an EV. The rotor shape of the proposed ferrite magnet motor is based on a spoke-type shape. Further, we developed two types of prototypes: one has a large magnetic torque equivalent to a conventional rare-earth permanent magnet motor for an equal volume, and another has a wide variable-speed range suitable for an EV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Ref. [13], the author confirmed that combination both radial flux and axial flux was effective in increasing the flux density. In order to achieve high torque per volume, the transverse-flux motor was proposed in Ref.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Ref. [13], the author confirmed that combination both radial flux and axial flux was effective in increasing the flux density. In order to achieve high torque per volume, the transverse-flux motor was proposed in Ref.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some authors apply a ferrite magnet to the electric machine as an approach to be free from rare-earth materials [11][12][13]. In Ref.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, EVs with several types of three-phase electric motors have been proposed, such as permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs), switched-reluctance motors (SRMs), and induction motors (IMs) [14][15][16]. PMSM offers high efficiency [14]. SRMs give cost-effective, but poor efficiency and high ripple torque [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between the two types is the inset permanent magnet rotor with higher mechanical resistance and lower eddy current loss than the surface-mounted type but lower manufacturing costs compared to interior permanent magnet structures [12][13]. The most applied type as a traction motor for electric vehicles is the interior PMM [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%