1981
DOI: 10.2969/jmsj/03330509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison theorems for functional differential equations with deviating arguments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous papers dealing with oscillatory properties of (E) (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]10]). Most papers are devoted to canonical equations, where conditions opposite to (1.1) are assumed to hold, that is,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous papers dealing with oscillatory properties of (E) (see, e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]10]). Most papers are devoted to canonical equations, where conditions opposite to (1.1) are assumed to hold, that is,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This comparison theorem has been generalized by Kusano and Naito [14] and Dzurina [7] to differential equations with quasi-derivatives. But the corresponding comparison principle for advanced differential equations is still missing.…”
Section: This Is a Contradiction And We Conclude That A(t) [X (T)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Foster and Grimmer [10] and Kusano and Naito [14], we say that x(t) is a solution of degree 0 if it satisfies (C 0 ), while x(t) satisfying (C 2 ) is said to be of degree 2. If we denote by N the set of all nonoscillatory solution of degree , then the set N of all nonoscillatory solutions of (E) has the following decomposition N = N 0 ∪ N 2 .…”
Section: This Is a Contradiction And We Conclude That A(t) [X (T)]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper [3] Kusano and Naito have presented a useful comparison principle which under conditions (i) and (ii) enables us to deduce property (B) of a delay equation of the form (1) from that of the ordinary differential equation…”
Section: We Always Assume That (I) Ri(i) 0 ^ I ^ 2 R(t) and P(t) Armentioning
confidence: 99%