2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison to mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main groups of functionalization methods, namely, covalent and non-covalent functionalization. The first group of functionalization methods is characterized by the surface oxidation of carbon and the binding of organic/inorganic ions/atoms/molecules via covalent bonds, using atoms (fluorine or nitrogen), functional groups (hydroxyl, amino or carboxyl groups), biomolecules, or polymers, at end-caps and defect sites [32,51]. Consequently, the interfacial interactions of GR are highly enhanced.…”
Section: Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main groups of functionalization methods, namely, covalent and non-covalent functionalization. The first group of functionalization methods is characterized by the surface oxidation of carbon and the binding of organic/inorganic ions/atoms/molecules via covalent bonds, using atoms (fluorine or nitrogen), functional groups (hydroxyl, amino or carboxyl groups), biomolecules, or polymers, at end-caps and defect sites [32,51]. Consequently, the interfacial interactions of GR are highly enhanced.…”
Section: Functionalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the f‐GNPs, T 5% , T 10% , and T Max increased by approximately 130°C, and the maximum mass loss rate decreased to 8%/min. These features differed from the noncovalent functionalization between GNPs and MEL under ball‐milling conditions . In these previous reports, the noncovalent functionalization that formed after ball milling does not improve the T Max in their TG curves, and the noncovalent MEL disappeared upon washing with hot water .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As reported previously and shown in Figure 1A, by using 1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4,6‐triamine (MEL) and ball milling, noncovalently functionalized GNPs can be produced to improve the interfacial adhesion of the GNPs with an epoxy matrix. However, the π‐π interactions are noncovalent and do not change the GNP surface properties markedly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, for the nanocomposites with plenty of CNTs, the pull-out of CNT and CNT bridging are the main enhancement mechanisms of mechanical properties. The reinforcing effect by nanoparticle bridging and the push-pull mechanism has been also observed within the CNT-epoxy nanocomposites [ 49 ], GNP based epoxy nanocomposites [ 49 , 50 ], and nanocomposites with hybrid nano-fillers [ 51 ]. Figure 18 b shows the SEM image (×5000) of the nanocomposite specimen with a MWCNT:GNP ratio of 9:1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%