1996
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040016x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons between an Upland and a Pima Cotton Cultivar: II. Nutrient Uptake and Partitioning

Abstract: Uptake and partitioning of N, P, and K by Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) have been studied, but no such work has included American Pima cotton (G. barbadense L.). Our objective was to describe the N, P, and K uptake and partitioning into various plant parts for two representative Upland and Pima cotton cultivars. Upland ‘Deltapine 90’ (DPL 90) and Pima ‘S‐6’ were grown at two south‐central Arizona locations for 3 yr. Beginning 14 to 20 d after emergence, the aboveground portions of cotton plants were ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
20
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The average N found in seed was calculated to be 42.1 and 3.0 g N kg −1 removed in the harvest lint. Although, this value is similar to Mullins and Burmester (1990) and Unruh and Silvertooth (1996), it is much higher than the recorded optimum N rates for cotton grown in Oklahoma of 83 g N kg −1 lint (Girma et al, 2007). If these plant components (burs, leaves, and stems) will be accounted in the algorithm, this will result to a 146.4 g N kg −1 lint.…”
Section: Percentage Nitrogen Removalsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average N found in seed was calculated to be 42.1 and 3.0 g N kg −1 removed in the harvest lint. Although, this value is similar to Mullins and Burmester (1990) and Unruh and Silvertooth (1996), it is much higher than the recorded optimum N rates for cotton grown in Oklahoma of 83 g N kg −1 lint (Girma et al, 2007). If these plant components (burs, leaves, and stems) will be accounted in the algorithm, this will result to a 146.4 g N kg −1 lint.…”
Section: Percentage Nitrogen Removalsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The NUE levels reported in the literature ranged from 25 to 60% (Bassett et al, 1970;Fritschi et al, 2004a,b;Hou et al, 2007;Janat, 2005;Unruh and Silvertooth, 1996). It was, however, discussed that soil type and climate play a significant role on expected NUE in cotton.…”
Section: Efficiency Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cotton is the only crop that is a net export, as processing does not happen locally. Cotton lint only contains trace amounts of P, but P exports in cottonseed for oil production are substantial for the agricultural sector (Unruh and Silvertooth 1996). We assumed annual steady state for agricultural vegetation and constant standing pools for orchards over the one-year study period (see Appendix A for more details).…”
Section: Mass Balance Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In crops yielding 1180 to 1630 kg lint/ha, Bassett et al (1970) measured export of 70, 11 and 21 kg/ha N, P and K respectively and noted that Na was largely excluded from the seed. Unruh and Silvertooth (1996) The equations take the form Y = a + bX, where Y is lint yield (kg/ha) and X is the nutrient uptake (g or kg/ha). Standard error of the coefficient is given in parentheses; P < 0.01 for all coefficients The equations take the form Y = a + bX, where Y is nutrient export (kg/ha) and X is the nutrient uptake (g or kg/ha).…”
Section: Nutrient Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%