2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of coagulation efficiency of conventional aluminium sulfate and enhanced composite aluminium sulfate/polydimethyldiallylammonium chloride coagulants coupled with rapid sand filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, excess inorganic coagulant dosage has introduced the problem of not only increased treatment cost, but also residual aluminium and iron content that has exceeded maximum allowable limits set by the World Health Organization for drinking water (WHO, 2008;Yang et al, 2013;Alzahrani et al, 2020). Treatment methods for lightly micropolluted raw water may also involve pre-oxidation and technologies such as enhanced coagulation, and advanced treatment technology or using membrane and advanced oxidation processes in combination with conventional treatment methods such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection (Yu and Graham, 2015;Brandt et al, 2017;Nascimento et al, 2019;Adebayo et al, 2021). Among these treatment technologies, enhanced coagulation using new coagulants, controlling the pH, or improvement of treatment facilities are the most commonly used, but the most feasible, efficient, and low-cost method is to enhance coagulation by using effective coagulants that have application advantages such as simple operation, and easy implementation which does not necessarily require changing the existing facilities (Moussas and Zouboulis, 2009;Yang et al, 2012 (Tolkou andZouboulis, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, excess inorganic coagulant dosage has introduced the problem of not only increased treatment cost, but also residual aluminium and iron content that has exceeded maximum allowable limits set by the World Health Organization for drinking water (WHO, 2008;Yang et al, 2013;Alzahrani et al, 2020). Treatment methods for lightly micropolluted raw water may also involve pre-oxidation and technologies such as enhanced coagulation, and advanced treatment technology or using membrane and advanced oxidation processes in combination with conventional treatment methods such as coagulation, sedimentation, filtration and disinfection (Yu and Graham, 2015;Brandt et al, 2017;Nascimento et al, 2019;Adebayo et al, 2021). Among these treatment technologies, enhanced coagulation using new coagulants, controlling the pH, or improvement of treatment facilities are the most commonly used, but the most feasible, efficient, and low-cost method is to enhance coagulation by using effective coagulants that have application advantages such as simple operation, and easy implementation which does not necessarily require changing the existing facilities (Moussas and Zouboulis, 2009;Yang et al, 2012 (Tolkou andZouboulis, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, various inorganic aluminium and iron salt coagulants are the main coagulants used by drinking water production plants worldwide, and have performed well for many years for many countries (Nowacka et al, 2014;Bratby, 2016;Cui et al, 2020;Adebayo et al, 2021). However, because of the challenge of meeting stringent water regulations and the demand for continuous improvement of water quality, the role those inorganic coagulants or their complexes can play is becoming increasingly limited, given the practical constraints of effectiveness and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations