2024
DOI: 10.3390/w16020302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Different Machine Learning-Based Rainfall–Runoff Simulations under Changing Environments

Chenliang Li,
Ying Jiao,
Guangyuan Kan
et al.

Abstract: Climate change and human activities have a great impact on the environment and have challenged the assumption of the stability of the hydrological time series and the consistency of the observed data. In order to investigate the applicability of machine learning (ML)-based rainfall–runoff (RR) simulation methods under a changing environment scenario, several ML-based RR simulation models implemented in novel continuous and non-real-time correction manners were constructed. The proposed models incorporated cate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented study examined the main geological findings on the territory of the study area, and carried out an analysis of the geological processes occurring in this area. The features of the relief and landscape were considered, and the data on the soils and geological formations present in the territory were provided [112][113][114]. One of the im-portant aspects of the work was the study of the environmental situation in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented study examined the main geological findings on the territory of the study area, and carried out an analysis of the geological processes occurring in this area. The features of the relief and landscape were considered, and the data on the soils and geological formations present in the territory were provided [112][113][114]. One of the im-portant aspects of the work was the study of the environmental situation in the field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%