2017
DOI: 10.1515/phys-2017-0053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image

Abstract: Feature point extraction technology has become a research hotspot in the photogrammetry and computer vision. The commonly used point feature extraction operators are SIFT operator, Forstner operator, Harris operator and Moravec operator, etc. With the high spatial resolution characteristics, UAV image is di erent from the traditional aviation image. Based on these characteristics of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), this paper uses several operators referred above to extract feature points from the building i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It depends on the characteristics of feature on the image themselves. Images containing 'round feature shape' like vegetation, shrubbery area and etc were suited with 'blob' detectors (SIFT and SURF) since it more efficient on those conditions [54] [55] and [56]. SURF detectors performed efficiently in multispectral face recognitions where the combinations of conventional SURF detectors and FREAK descriptions extracted highest number of feature matching compare others algorithms [57].…”
Section: Multispectral Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It depends on the characteristics of feature on the image themselves. Images containing 'round feature shape' like vegetation, shrubbery area and etc were suited with 'blob' detectors (SIFT and SURF) since it more efficient on those conditions [54] [55] and [56]. SURF detectors performed efficiently in multispectral face recognitions where the combinations of conventional SURF detectors and FREAK descriptions extracted highest number of feature matching compare others algorithms [57].…”
Section: Multispectral Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, SIFT is more suitable for obtaining images in forestry, shrubbery, and grassland. Another drawback is SIFT requires large complex computations, resulting in lower imagematching performance [10].…”
Section: Sift Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hough transform can detect curves and straight lines in images. In 1977, Moravec proposed Moravec operator, which uses pixel gray autocorrelation function to detect feature points [4] . In 2004, D G Lowe proposed an algorithm based on scale transformation invariance (SIFT), The algorithm is used to achieve accurate image matching [5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%