Comparisons of human reliability data between analog and digital environments

Looking beyond the screen: A systematic review of safety in control rooms

“…The data comparison revealed that HEPs in the digital MCR were generally lower than those in the analog MCR. Therefore, the authors cautioned against directly applying HEPs from analog to digital MCRs, suggesting that specific HRA data should be collected for digital systems [ 25 ]. Another critical issue in this context is the future needs of HRA.…”

“…Both components play an integral role in ensuring the overall reliability and safety of the system. In the context of equipment reliability, the study by Park and Kim compared the HEP in analog and digital MCRs and emphasized the need for specific HRA data tailored to digital systems to ensure accurate assessments of equipment reliability [ 25 ]. In one hand, it is crucial to evaluate how the introduction of new technology in CRs affects human operators and their interaction with the equipment.…”

“…Most frameworks and models aim to reduce human-related accidents in CRs [ 22 , 23 ]. Studies conducted on equipment reliability have attempted to predict HEP using simulators and developing various programs related to humans and technology [ 25 ]. To provide a correct understanding of human performance, studies in the future of reliability in CRs must consider a combination of technology, humans, and work processes [ 26 ].…”

An Experimental Investigation of Students' Learning Effects when Using a Simplified Nuclear Simulator

“…Securing sufficient and appropriate data is critical for reducing uncertainty in human reliability analysis (HRA) quantification [1,2]. Adequate HRA data allows for representative samples of variable human performance, and helps in estimating the possibility of human error under various scenarios [1].…”