2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of impact flakes derived from hyena and hammerstone long bone breakage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most efficient technique to extract marrow relies on simply striking the bone with a hammer (usually a stone) when the bone is held in the hand or placed on an anvil, or by striking the bone against a stationary anvil 61 – 63 . The precise methods used to break marrow bones vary between different cultural groups 64 , but the blows typically result in a circular or oval impact area with flakes that are driven into the medullary cavity at the point of impact 65 67 . Successfully breaking open the marrow bone can usually be achieved by a single, carefully judged blow 61 , 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most efficient technique to extract marrow relies on simply striking the bone with a hammer (usually a stone) when the bone is held in the hand or placed on an anvil, or by striking the bone against a stationary anvil 61 – 63 . The precise methods used to break marrow bones vary between different cultural groups 64 , but the blows typically result in a circular or oval impact area with flakes that are driven into the medullary cavity at the point of impact 65 67 . Successfully breaking open the marrow bone can usually be achieved by a single, carefully judged blow 61 , 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the remains have been measured in millimeters and breakage has been analyzed distinguishing between green and dry (Villa and Mahieu 1991). Diagnostic elements of intentional breakage have also been documented: percussion notches, percussion pits, pseudo-notches, positive flakes, adhering flakes, flakes, microstriations and striations, and peeling (Capaldo and Blumenschine 1994;Coil et al 2020;Pickering and Egeland 2006;Vettese et al 2020). To discern possible breakage patterns, their specific location in the bone has been collected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every anatomical element (over 3 cm long) was examined under a LEICA S8 APO stereoscope with 10× eyepieces in search of bone surface biostratinomic and diagenetic alterations, such as cut marks (grouped as skinning, dismembering and defleshing types following Binford 107 , Galán and Domínguez-Rodrigo 108 and Nilssen 109 ), hammerstone percussion marks (including conchoidal notches [110][111][112] ), type and angle of fracturing (fresh-green versus old-dry following Villa and Mahieu 113 , percussion marks including cortical percussion notches (negative flake scars); impact flakes (positive flake scars); adhering flakes, percussion pits and crushing marks 110,111,[114][115][116][117][118] . According to diagnostic characteristics, impact flakes were defined and distinguished from those made by carnivores 119 : ventral face with the point of detachments and bulb; greater breadth than length; absence or reduction of the cortical surface. Thermoalterations colour degrees were recorded following Stiner et al 120 .…”
Section: Archaeozoological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%