1980
DOI: 10.1139/e80-086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of magnetic anomalies of lithospheric origin measured by satellite and airborne magnetometers over western Canada

Abstract: Crustal magnetic anomaly data from the Orbiting Geophysical Observatories 2,4, and 6 (Pogo) satellites are compared with upward-continued aeromagnetic data between 59-85"N latitude and 220-260"E longitude. Agreement is good, both in anomaly location and in amplitude, giving confidence that it is possible to proceed with the derivation and interpretation of satellite anomaly maps in all parts of the globe. The data contain a magnetic high over the Alpha ridge suggesting continental composition and a magnetic lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Working with the 225 satellite passes that meet the low noise and altitude criterion, we remove the main field using the model POGO (2/72), which includes spherical harmonics up to degree and order 13 for both the constant and the first time-derivative terms (Langel et al, 1980). We use a highpass Kaiser filter with a cutoff wavelength of 12,000 km on a pass-by-pass basis following Langel et al (1993).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working with the 225 satellite passes that meet the low noise and altitude criterion, we remove the main field using the model POGO (2/72), which includes spherical harmonics up to degree and order 13 for both the constant and the first time-derivative terms (Langel et al, 1980). We use a highpass Kaiser filter with a cutoff wavelength of 12,000 km on a pass-by-pass basis following Langel et al (1993).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those of us who have been attempting to study crustal magnetic anomalies have been using a model of degree/order 13 (LANGEL et al, 1980a). This choice is confirmed by LANGEL and EsTES (1982) who derived the spatial power spectrum (LowEs, 1966(LowEs, , 1974, (4) for n=1 to 23 using Magsat data. The derived spectrum showed a clear break near n=14 which was interpreted to mean that the core field dominates for n<13 and the crustal field for n>15.…”
Section: Model Degree and Ordermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Satellite data are not immune to these limitations, although they are not as severe. LANGEL and ESTES (1982) showed that crustal anomaly fields dominate the Magsat data for wavelengths shorter than those corresponding to degree and order fifteen. This means that with present methods of modeling, we cannot determine the main field representation beyond degree and order 13 or 14, regardless of the quality of our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these attempts used both qualitative and quantitative comparisons of satellite data with upward-continued aeromagnetic data (Langel et al, 1980;von Frese et al, 1982: Won and Son, 1982: Schnetzler et al, 1985Arkani-Hamed and Hinze, 1990) or downwardcontinued satellite data (Arkani-Hamed et al, 1985). The results of many of these studies implied that the correlation between the aeromagnetic and satellite anomalies was generally poor, but there were also significant similarities between the two data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%