2001
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.4.509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Microbiological Evaluations of Selected Kitchen Areas with Visual Inspections for Preventing Potential Risk of Foodborne Outbreaks in Food Service Operations

Abstract: Most local health departments utilize visual, but not microbiological, methods when inspecting food service operations. To evaluate the marginal utility of microbial testing for minimizing potential risks of foodborne outbreaks in restaurants, swab samples were taken from handwashing sink faucets, freshly cleaned and sanitized food-contact surfaces, and from cooler or freezer door handles in 70 of 350 category-three (high-risk) food service operations in Toledo, Ohio. The swabs were inoculated onto different s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbiological analysis of surfaces has been proven to be an effective tool for assessing the cleaning practices that are carried out in a kitchen and for improving hygienic behaviors in food handlers and making them more permanent. Therefore, coinciding with the opinion of other authors, we propose regular monitoring of work surfaces by means of microbial counts because this demonstrates the level of cleanliness more objectively than by means of visual inspection (Kassa et al, 2001). However, there are currently no existing microbiological criteria in Spain for evaluating hygiene of surfaces in catering kitchens.…”
Section: Assessment Of Surfaces Hygienementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Microbiological analysis of surfaces has been proven to be an effective tool for assessing the cleaning practices that are carried out in a kitchen and for improving hygienic behaviors in food handlers and making them more permanent. Therefore, coinciding with the opinion of other authors, we propose regular monitoring of work surfaces by means of microbial counts because this demonstrates the level of cleanliness more objectively than by means of visual inspection (Kassa et al, 2001). However, there are currently no existing microbiological criteria in Spain for evaluating hygiene of surfaces in catering kitchens.…”
Section: Assessment Of Surfaces Hygienementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Typically, this monitoring is carried out by direct observation, although regular microbiological checks using contact agar plates are recommended because they provide more accurate and objective data (Kassa, Harrington, Bisesi, & Khuder, 2001). Since there are no established limits (CFU/cm 2 ) for considering a surface to be clean in the catering industry in Spain, an evaluation of cleanliness of utensils and equipment was performed, using the acceptable limit of ≤50 CFU/25cm 2 based on reference literature (Moragas & De Pablo, 2010;Forsythe & Hayes, 1998;Nortje et al, 1990;Orefice, 1984;Patterson, 1971) and our laboratory experience (more than 3000 surface samples analyzed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Italy the provision of food and beverages through This system identifies the risks for human health and the safety and preventive measures for their elimination and/or their control (Dragoni & Bonomi, 2008). Kassa et al (2001) also stated the importance of direct visual inspection, as another measure for preventing potential risk of food-borne illnesses (Hall et al, 2007;Kassa, Harrington, Bisesi, & Khuder, 2001). As mentioned above, previous studies focused on hygiene and contamination of the internal mechanical parts of the vending machines, on the microbiological quality of the powders used to prepare the beverages, and/or on the beverages direct contamination (Hall et al, 2007;Nelms et al, 1997;Vallone & Bonomi, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%