1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02347680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of nutrient recovery and specific leaf area variation between Carex lasiocarpa var. occultans and Carex thunbergii var. appendiculata with reference to nutrient conditions and shading by Phragmites australis

Abstract: The distribution of two sedge species was studied in two mires which differ in abiotic environments and in distribution ofPhragmites australis. Carex lasiocarpa var. occultans dominated in nutrient-poor valley mire, and Carex thunbergii var. appendiculata dominated in nutrient-rich flood plain subject to water fluctuations. Phragmites australis grew well in nutrient-rich conditions. The distribution of C. lasiocarpa showed a strong negative correlation with P. australis coverage, whereas C. thunbergii coverage… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have documented similar changes in SLA after transplantation. SLA is known to vary with light availability (Huffman et al ., 1994; Onimaru & Yabe, 1996; Valladares et al ., 2000), as well as other abiotic variables such as nitrogen concentrations, water availability, salt spray and substrate salinity (Alpha et al ., 1996; Cramer et al ., 2000; Knops & Reinhart, 2000). Therefore, it should be reiterated that relationships between PFD and SLA do not necessarily imply that light is the only proximate mechanism influencing intraspecific patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have documented similar changes in SLA after transplantation. SLA is known to vary with light availability (Huffman et al ., 1994; Onimaru & Yabe, 1996; Valladares et al ., 2000), as well as other abiotic variables such as nitrogen concentrations, water availability, salt spray and substrate salinity (Alpha et al ., 1996; Cramer et al ., 2000; Knops & Reinhart, 2000). Therefore, it should be reiterated that relationships between PFD and SLA do not necessarily imply that light is the only proximate mechanism influencing intraspecific patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohwi, however, are able to thrive in the nutrient-rich areas dominated by P. australis (Onimaru and Yabe 1996). A flexible specific leaf area enables C. thunbergii to maximize the capture of available sunlight in P. australis stands (Onimaru and Yabe 1996). Lobelia dortmanna L. individuals were larger and had greater clonal growth, dry weight and number of seeds when growing in a low-density (22.9 ± 6.6 shoots m -2 ) common reed swamp on littoral sites than when growing outside that swamp.…”
Section: Areas Dominated By 4xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…occultans (Fr.) Kukenthal, even in nutrient-rich environments (Onimaru and Yabe 1996). Shade-tolerant sedges such as Carex thunbergii var.…”
Section: Areas Dominated By 4xmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, a negative correlation was shown between nutrient level and aboveground biomass; that is, the highest concentrations of TDN and K in the soil water were observed in the dwarf Eleocharis community. The concentrations of these nutrients in this mire are quite high: eight‐ to 11‐fold (N) and four‐ to sevenfold (K) higher than those in other minerotrophic mires in northern Japan (Wolejko & Ito 1986; Onimaru & Yabe 1996; Haraguchi et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%