2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/chicc.2017.8029128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of planar detection for service robot with RANSAC and region growing algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is to refine g opt prediction by the learning-based grasp planning loop to g opt , which the surface center g opt belongs to, at the robot's home position in the first iteration. The second is to provide the surface center and normal to the 2.5D VS. To calculate surface features, we use the region-growing algorithm for surface construction, because region growing is more robust than RANSAC in actual applications [44]. To determine the region expansion rule, an initial seeking point g and the normal of the surface to which g belongs must be calculated.…”
Section: Visual-guided Robot Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is to refine g opt prediction by the learning-based grasp planning loop to g opt , which the surface center g opt belongs to, at the robot's home position in the first iteration. The second is to provide the surface center and normal to the 2.5D VS. To calculate surface features, we use the region-growing algorithm for surface construction, because region growing is more robust than RANSAC in actual applications [44]. To determine the region expansion rule, an initial seeking point g and the normal of the surface to which g belongs must be calculated.…”
Section: Visual-guided Robot Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%