2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Preoperative Three-Dimensional Planning and Surgical Reconstruction in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: Reconstruction of important parameters such as femoral offset and torsion is inaccurate, when templating is based on plain x-rays. We evaluate intraoperative reproducibility of pre-operative CT-based 3D-templating in a consecutive series of 50 patients undergoing primary cementless THA through an anterior approach. Pre-operative planning was compared to a postoperative CT scan by image fusion. The implant size was correctly predicted in 100% of the stems, 94% of the cups and 88% of the heads (length). The diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D planning-guided THA showed a high accuracy, comparing well with the previously reported studies about the 3D planning methodology using the Hip-Plan software [11][12][13]. Furthermore, contrary to navigation or fluoroscopic guidance techniques [17], 3D planning uses only local anatomic landmarks and can be used as easily for all surgical approaches and regardless of the patient's position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 3D planning-guided THA showed a high accuracy, comparing well with the previously reported studies about the 3D planning methodology using the Hip-Plan software [11][12][13]. Furthermore, contrary to navigation or fluoroscopic guidance techniques [17], 3D planning uses only local anatomic landmarks and can be used as easily for all surgical approaches and regardless of the patient's position.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, the conventional two-dimensional (2D) templating has a relatively low accuracy despite a correct image calibration [10,11]. With respect to the components size and position, an excellent accuracy was reported with a novel three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning technique as the difficulties likely to be encountered were detected and solved pre-operatively by adapting the surgical procedure and choosing the optimal implants which would best restore the hip biomechanics [11][12][13][14]. However, it is not clear whether this technique helped to decrease the complications rate with respect to intra-operative fractures, dislocation risk and complaints about lower limb discrepancy (LLD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, it is our practice to take great care with dry assembly of the neck-stem junction on the back table [16]. We selected the best neck option based on preoperative 3D CT findings [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure was planned using 3D computed tomography (CT) and HIP-PLAN software (Symbios, Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland) [9]. A direct anterior approach was used.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the accuracy is extended to predict to one size, the value is increased to 60-94% [15,25]. Therefore, computed tomography (CT) scans were developed, demonstrating a clearly higher accuracy in size prediction (estimated at 94-100%) [13,30,31]. In the present study, we used the "modiCAS|3D ® -software" (modiCAS GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for 3D templating based on a preoperative CT scan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%