2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00580-014-2035-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of results between three in-house biochemistry analyzers and a commercial laboratory analyzer for feline plasma using multiple quality specifications

Abstract: Comparisons of results between three in-house biochemistry analyzers and a commercial laboratory analyzer for feline plasma using multiple quality specifications. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 24(5), 1075-1089.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using ASVCP recommended TE a acceptability limits to evaluate clinical rather than analytic acceptability in a method comparison dataset have been used in at least 2 studies, with the authors considering either > 90% or > 95% of measurements within these limits as acceptable . More than 95% of results fell within the TE a coverage range for albumin, creatinine, glucose, phosphorus, total proteins, and urea when comparing feline plasma on the VetTest and Cobas (AST, CK, and GGT not investigated) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using ASVCP recommended TE a acceptability limits to evaluate clinical rather than analytic acceptability in a method comparison dataset have been used in at least 2 studies, with the authors considering either > 90% or > 95% of measurements within these limits as acceptable . More than 95% of results fell within the TE a coverage range for albumin, creatinine, glucose, phosphorus, total proteins, and urea when comparing feline plasma on the VetTest and Cobas (AST, CK, and GGT not investigated) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical relevance of method differences was assessed: a TE a range was calculated for each Cobas measurement and it was determined whether the matching VetTest result was within this range . Methods were considered clinically equivalent if > 95% of VetTest results fell into this range, for each analyte …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012, Baral et al . 2015b). Of the electrolytes measured, [Na + ] and [K + ] were more prone to error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%