1992
DOI: 10.2307/1446150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of Salinity Tolerances and Osmotic Regulatory Capabilities in Populations of Sailfin Molly (Poecilia latipinna) from Brackish and Fresh Waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, survivorship did not differ among fish exposed to salinities ranging from 0 to 15 ppt if this exposure was preceded by an acclimation period of 42 d (Nordlie & Mirandi 1996). In Poecilia latipinna collected from freshwater and brackish (mean = 15 ppt) sites, the plasma osmotic concentrations did not significantly differ over the range of salinity levels of from 0 to 75 ppt, and survival was affected only for salinities > 70 ppt, where the brackish population had a higher survivorship (Nordlie et al 1992). The environmental gradient along which we collected these fish ranged in salinity from 0.1 to 12.8 ppt, which is within the salinity tolerance limits of all 3 species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, survivorship did not differ among fish exposed to salinities ranging from 0 to 15 ppt if this exposure was preceded by an acclimation period of 42 d (Nordlie & Mirandi 1996). In Poecilia latipinna collected from freshwater and brackish (mean = 15 ppt) sites, the plasma osmotic concentrations did not significantly differ over the range of salinity levels of from 0 to 75 ppt, and survival was affected only for salinities > 70 ppt, where the brackish population had a higher survivorship (Nordlie et al 1992). The environmental gradient along which we collected these fish ranged in salinity from 0.1 to 12.8 ppt, which is within the salinity tolerance limits of all 3 species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…obs. ), followed by G. affinis, with a range of 0 to 58.5 ppt (Chervinski 1983), and P. latipinna is the most tolerant (0 to 80 ppt) (Nordlie et al 1992). Even though these 3 species occur along a salinity gradient of coastal marshes in Louisiana, their relative abundances differ with salinity: H. formosa and G. affinis occur at higher densities at fresh marshes, while P. latipinna occurs at higher densities in intermediate and brackish marshes (A. T. Hitch et al unpubl.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some species that can tolerate higher salinities and a few that can survive extended exposure in water with salinities over 120 ppt (Nordlie 1985;Nordlie et al 1992;Nordlie and Haney 1998). Most of these species are euryhaline inhabitants of coastal intertidal pools since the most saline inland lakes/seas are far too saline for vertebrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these species are euryhaline inhabitants of coastal intertidal pools since the most saline inland lakes/seas are far too saline for vertebrates. Tolerant fish come from diverse phylogenetic origins, but the best studied are from the families Cyprinodontidae, such as the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus, sheepshead minnow Cyprinodon variegatus, and Arabian killifish Aphanius dispar; Cichlidae, such as Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus and black-chinned tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron; and Poecilidae, such as the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna (Nordlie 1985;Nordlie et al 1992;Nordlie and Haney 1998;Tine et al 2007;Ouattara et al 2009). Studies have documented the hypersalinity tolerance of these species and others either in the lab or their natural habitat, but relatively few studies have examined the underlying physiological and biochemical specializations these species possess that allow them to survive in such harsh conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately, 300 adult sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna L., of both sexes (total weight = 20.5 ± 0.33 g (mean ± SD); total length = 85.73 ± 0.03 mm (mean ± SD)) were obtained from a local dealer and acclimated to 15 g/L saltwater to favor effective delivery of the agent from water to the animals in hyperosmotic condition (Nordlie et al, 1992). In order to select the animals with synchronous reproductive cycle, they were then maintained for another two weeks in a 1000 L community during which all of the females bread at the 15th day constituted experimental females (N = 89) and the males displaying least heterosexual mating attempts (< 2 attempts/h) at the same day were selected as experimental males (N = 56) and kept in sexually isolated tanks one week prior to experiment.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%