1991
DOI: 10.1021/la00060a041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons of self-assembled monolayers on silver and gold: mixed monolayers derived from HS(CH2)21X and HS(CH2)10Y (X, Y = CH3, CH2OH) have similar properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
167
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus it serves as a measure for the order of the monolayer on the surface. Laibinis et al compared the wetting properties of SAMs on Au and Ag [49]. They have shown that the structural difference on the two surfaces does not play a significant role in the wettability and the interfacial composition of SAMs is the primary factor determining the wetting properties.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it serves as a measure for the order of the monolayer on the surface. Laibinis et al compared the wetting properties of SAMs on Au and Ag [49]. They have shown that the structural difference on the two surfaces does not play a significant role in the wettability and the interfacial composition of SAMs is the primary factor determining the wetting properties.…”
Section: Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 24 ] Assuming that the TEGT thiol molecule has a foot print area of 0.214 nm 2 , [ 25 ] a ratio of about 1 biotin-KKKKC peptide per 14 TEGT molecules needs to be reached on the surface. As reported in the literature, [ 26 ] the ratio of two-components in solution are rarely identical from that in the SAM, due to the preferential adsorption of one of the components. Thus, systematic studies were carried out in order to understand how the ratios in solution diverge from the ratios in the SAM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] This technique has been extensively explored in the literature, although backfilling with secondary thiols has not been as thoroughly examined. Microcontact printing does have the distinct advantage of deposting SAMs directly and does not require any destructive treatments.…”
Section: Other Patterning Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%