“…Patients with FIGO stage Ia2-Ib1 with small tumor size (less than 2 cm in diameter) without retroperitoneal lymph node metastases have been likely to undergo this operation, and the oncologic outcomes have been reported to be satisfactory, comparable with radical hysterectomy [3][4][5]. However, the reproductive outcomes of this operation appear insufficient, and some reports indicated that radical vaginal trachelectomy, rather than abdominal trachelectomy, shows more favorable reproductive outcomes [3,[6][7][8][9], while the oncologic outcomes of vaginal trachelectomy appeared to be inferior to those of the abdominal procedure, especially in patients with tumors larger than 2 cm [8,[10][11][12]. The precise cause of the relatively poor reproductive outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy remains unclear, but it is possible that disruption of autonomic nerves that innervate the uterine Objectives: Nerve-sparing techniques to avoid bladder dysfunction in abdominal radical hysterectomy have been established during the past two decades, and they have been applied to radical trachelectomy.…”