Comparisons of visual outcomes between bilateral implantation and mix-and-match implantation of three types intraocular lenses

Ke, Shurui; Wan, Wenjuan; Li, Can

doi:10.1007/s10792-022-02513-0

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the literature reports favorable outcomes with these strategies, they may compromise near vision. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Some studies have analyzed the implantation of an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a trifocal IOL in the fellow eye, with good results, as an alternative to bilateral trifocal IOL. Another option is the implantation of a monofocal IOL in the dominant eye and a trifocal IOL in the nondominant eye.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, to our knowledge, our study is the first to compare the blended strategy with the bilateral use of diffractive lenses. 3,[7][8][9]31,32 In this study, we used an enhanced monofocal IOL in the dominant eye and a dual-technology diffractive lens in the fellow eye (in one of the groups). This is because studies show that enhanced monofocal IOLs in both eyes offered equivalent far vision as that offered by monofocal IOLs and better intermediate and near vision than that offered by monofocal IOLs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the literature reports favorable outcomes with these strategies, they may compromise near vision. 1–8…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, several pseudophakic patients with monofocal IOL implants require reading spectacles to compensate for the loss of clear vision at intermediate or near distances. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Advanced IOL designs, including multifocal IOLs, are currently used in clinical practice to treat presbyopia in pseudophakic patients. [11][12][13][14][15] Most multifocal IOLs available in the market are equipped with either 2 optical zones, catering to distant and near vision, or 3 optical zones, accommodating distant, intermediate, and near vision.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, several pseudophakic patients with monofocal IOL implants require reading spectacles to compensate for the loss of clear vision at intermediate or near distances. 1–10…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Comparison of visual outcomes of bilateral dual-technology diffractive intraocular lens vs blended enhanced monofocal with dual-technology intraocular lens

Hida,

Moscovici,

Cortez

et al. 2024

J Cataract Refract Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes following implantation of Tecnis Synergy (ZFR00V) IOLs in both eyes and implantation of the Tecnis Synergy and Tecnis Eyhance (ICB00) combination in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: Setting: Department of Cataract at the Hospital Oftalmológico de Brasilia(HOB). Design: Prospective, interventional, randomized, parallel-group study. Results: Visual acuity was similar between the two groups (95% CI < 0.1 logMAR). A superior visual acuity of ≥ 20/25 (at -2.00 to -2.50 D) was achieved in Group 1 (bilateral ZFR00V) than in Group 2 (combination of ZFR00V/ICB00). The binocular defocus curve demonstrated better visual acuity at 40 cm (-2.00D) and 50 cm (-2.50D) in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Similar contrast sensitivity values were observed between the two groups. Patients in Group 1 reported higher satisfaction (completely satisfied) than those in Group 2 (p < 0.05). However, halos and glare were more pronounced in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Both presbyopia-correcting IOL combinations showed similar binocular visual acuity results. Group 1 demonstrated enhanced visual acuity in the defocus curve at 40 cm (-2.00D) and 50 cm (-2.50D). Comparable contrast sensitivity outcomes were observed in both groups. Patients were more completely satisfied in Group 1 than Group 2, despite the higher frequency of postoperative nighttime halos and glare.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although the literature reports favorable outcomes with these strategies, they may compromise near vision. 1–8…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, several pseudophakic patients with monofocal IOL implants require reading spectacles to compensate for the loss of clear vision at intermediate or near distances. 1–10…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Comparison of visual outcomes of bilateral dual-technology diffractive intraocular lens vs blended enhanced monofocal with dual-technology intraocular lens

Hida,

Moscovici,

Cortez

et al. 2024

J Cataract Refract Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Stereopsis Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Narrative Review

He,

Zhu,

et al. 2024

Ophthalmol Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent advancements in cataract surgery have broadened its scope from mere vision restoration to include correction of refractive errors and presbyopia. This evolution has introduced multifocal and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs), allowing enhanced vision across multiple distances. However, the influence of these advanced IOLs on stereopsis remains controversial. Factors influencing stereopsis after surgery include visual acuity,

show abstract

The impact of corneal higher-order aberrations on dynamic visual acuity post cataract surgery

Wu,

Wang,

et al. 2024

Front. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo explore the influence of corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) on dynamic visual acuity (DVA) post cataract surgery.MethodsA total of 27 patients with 45 eyes following cataract surgery were included in this study. The postoperative monocular object-moving DVA at the velocity of 20, 40, and 80 degrees per second (dps) were examined at 1 month. The total corneal HOAs were measured with Scheimpflug-based corneal topography. The correlation between postoperative DVA and HOAs was analyzed.ResultsSignificant difference was shown among DVA at different velocities (P < 0.001). The 20 dps DVA was significantly better than 40 (P < 0.001) and 80 (P < 0.001) dps DVA. No significant difference was observed between 40 and 80 dps DVA (P = 0.420). The vertical coma and the root mean square (RMS) of coma (RMScoma) were statistically correlated with 80 dps DVA (P < 0.05). The vertical trefoil, RMStrefoil and total RMSHOA were statistically correlated with 40 and 80 dps DVA (P < 0.05). The spherical aberration was not significantly associated with postoperative DVA (P > 0.05 for all velocites). The multivariate linear regression model revealed that age was a significant influential factor for 20 dps DVA (P = 0.002), and RMStrefoil (4 mm) and age were significantly associated with 40 and 80 dps DVA (P ≤ 0.01).ConclusionThe research demonstrated that larger corneal HOAs, especially coma and trefoil aberrations were significantly associated with worse high-speed DVA, but not spherical aberration post cataract surgery.

show abstract

Comparisons of visual outcomes between bilateral implantation and mix-and-match implantation of three types intraocular lenses

Cited by 3 publications

References 25 publications

Comparison of visual outcomes of bilateral dual-technology diffractive intraocular lens vs blended enhanced monofocal with dual-technology intraocular lens

Comparison of visual outcomes of bilateral dual-technology diffractive intraocular lens vs blended enhanced monofocal with dual-technology intraocular lens

Stereopsis Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Narrative Review

The impact of corneal higher-order aberrations on dynamic visual acuity post cataract surgery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About