2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparisons on aggregate risks from two sets of heterogeneous portfolios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many well-known distributions are SAI including the multivariate versions of Dirichlet distribution, inverted Dirichlet distribution, F distribution and Pareto distribution of type I. The notion of SAI has been applied in actuarial science to model the dependence among ordered random risks; see, for instance, Hua and Cheung (2008) and Zhang and Zhao (2015). RWSAI and WSAI are introduced by Wei (2014, 2015), and have been also applied in the field of financial engineering and actuarial science; see, for example, Cai and Wei (2015) and Zhang et al (2018b).…”
Section: Stochastic Versions Of Arrangement Increasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many well-known distributions are SAI including the multivariate versions of Dirichlet distribution, inverted Dirichlet distribution, F distribution and Pareto distribution of type I. The notion of SAI has been applied in actuarial science to model the dependence among ordered random risks; see, for instance, Hua and Cheung (2008) and Zhang and Zhao (2015). RWSAI and WSAI are introduced by Wei (2014, 2015), and have been also applied in the field of financial engineering and actuarial science; see, for example, Cai and Wei (2015) and Zhang et al (2018b).…”
Section: Stochastic Versions Of Arrangement Increasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n. In the literature, there has been tremendous study on the aggregate claim number n i=1 I i and the aggregate claim amount n i=1 I i X i by using various stochastic orders; see, for example, Ma (2000), Denuit and Frostig (2006), Khaledi and Ahmadi (2008), , Zhang and Zhao (2015) and Zhang et al (2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is known that multivariate versions of Dirichlet distribution, inverted Dirichlet distribution, F distribution and Pareto distribution of type I are all SAI and hence RWSAI and LWSAI whenever the corresponding parameters are arrayed in the ascending order. In the literature, SAI is employed to model the dependence among ordered random risks in actuarial science; see for instance, Hua and Cheung (2008), You and Li (2014) and Zhang and Zhao (2015). LWSAI, RWSAI and WSAI were introduced by Wei (2014, 2015) and have been applied in the field of financial engineering and actuarial science to model dependent stochastic returns and risks, respectively; see for example, Cai and Wei (2015) and Li (2015, 2016).…”
Section: Stochastic Versions Of Arrangement Increasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frostig (2001) and Hu and Ruan (2004) established sufficient conditions to compare aggregate claim amount by means of the symmetric supermodular, and multivariate usual and symmetric stochastic orders (see Shaked and Shanthikumar, 2007). After that, many researchers paid their attention to comparing the aggregate claim amounts arising from two sets of heterogeneous insurance portfolios; see, for example, Khaledi and Ahmadi (2008), Barmalzan et al (2015) and Zhang and Zhao (2015). However, these results were only developed under the independent assumption on the claim occurrence probabilities, which violates the fact that the occurrences of claims may be dependent in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , Y n ) in two portfolios, have been discussed by many researchers in literature; see, e.g., Karlin and Novikoff (1963), Ma (2000), Frostig (2001), Hu and Ruan (2004), Denuit and Frostig (2006), Khaledi and Ahmadi (2008), Zhang and Zhao (2015), , Li and Li (2016), Barmalzan et al (2018), , Barmalzan et al (2016), Barmalzan et al (2017), Balakrishnan et al (2018) and Li and Li (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%