2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-017-0627-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compartmental tongue resection with submental island flap reconstruction for large carcinoma of the oral tongue

Abstract: CTS via pull through technique with submental island flap reconstruction for large tongue cancer has been evolved to improve oncologic resections, obtaining a better local control of disease and increased survival rate with concomitant successful functional and esthetic outcomes especially in elderly patients with serious comorbidities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its use has also proven to decrease operative times, hospital stay, and ultimately morbidity and cost. 3,[5][6][7] However, its oncological safety remains controversial, with regards to the nodal basins in the vicinity of the pedicle, namely levels IA and IB, and despite meticulous dissection, the possibility of transferring occult lymph node metastases to the recipient site is still a concern. 8,9 In an attempt to overcome these concerns in our earlier series, we modified our harvest technique by first completing an oncologically sound neck dissection and limited the use of the flap to node negative patients and excluded patients that were previously irradiated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its use has also proven to decrease operative times, hospital stay, and ultimately morbidity and cost. 3,[5][6][7] However, its oncological safety remains controversial, with regards to the nodal basins in the vicinity of the pedicle, namely levels IA and IB, and despite meticulous dissection, the possibility of transferring occult lymph node metastases to the recipient site is still a concern. 8,9 In an attempt to overcome these concerns in our earlier series, we modified our harvest technique by first completing an oncologically sound neck dissection and limited the use of the flap to node negative patients and excluded patients that were previously irradiated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially favorable in older patients who have more redundant skin available for harvest and whose general condition may not be suitable for more complex procedures. Its use has also proven to decrease operative times, hospital stay, and ultimately morbidity and cost 3,5‐7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional surgery group, the universally accepted standard treatment was performed with a wide resection of the primary tumor with larger free macroscopic margins (1.5–2 cm)[ 14 ]. In the AUSR group, the entire anatomical unit (or subunit) with tumor involvement was completely removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%