2017
DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-731-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compatibility of different measurement techniques of global solar radiation and application for long-term observations at Izaña Observatory

Abstract: Abstract. A 1-year inter-comparison of classical and modern radiation and sunshine duration (SD) instruments has been performed at Izaña Atmospheric Observatory (IZO) located in Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain) starting on 17 July 2014. We compare daily global solar radiation (GSR H ) records measured with a Kipp & Zonen CM-21 pyranometer, taken in the framework of the Baseline Surface Radiation Network, with those measured with a multifilter rotating shadowband radiometer (MFRSR), a bimetallic pyranometer (PY… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater accuracy to be expected for the monthly and annual values analyzed in this study is limited by the 0.3% uncertainty in the World Radiometric Reference and the loss of accuracy involved in its transfer by calibration to the pyranometers in routine use. Error terms of 5% and 2% respectively have been estimated for monthly and annual values of E g ↓ [18] [19].…”
Section: Global Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater accuracy to be expected for the monthly and annual values analyzed in this study is limited by the 0.3% uncertainty in the World Radiometric Reference and the loss of accuracy involved in its transfer by calibration to the pyranometers in routine use. Error terms of 5% and 2% respectively have been estimated for monthly and annual values of E g ↓ [18] [19].…”
Section: Global Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration procedure used for the Callendar Sunshine Receiver, the pyranometer which provided the earliest and longest United States series of measurements, has been described in detail (Kimball, ), The Eppley pyranometers used at the majority of the measurement sites analysed (Hand, ) were calibrated by the manufacturers. As the uncertainty of the 1913 Smithsonian scale was 2% (WMO, ) it seems reasonable to assume a similar value for the uncertainty of measured annual mean values, comparable with that currently assigned to network measurements of E g ↓ (Gilgen et al ., ; Garcia et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These include 65 stations of the Japanese national network of climate stations covering an area extending from 25° to 45°N and from 125° to 140°E (Stanhill and Cohen, ). Increases in sunshine duration were measured at eight sites in Taiwan (Liu et al ., ), at 17 Swiss sites (Sanchez‐Lorenzo and Wild, ) and at Izana, a mountain top observatory in Tenerife, an island in the Atlantic Ocean, some 300 km west of the coast of Africa (Garcia et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The measured input parameters used in the LibRadtran model simulations are shown in Table 6. The model input parameters -precipitable water vapor (PWV), aerosol optical depth (AOD), total ozone column and surface albedo -are measured at IZA (García et al, 2014(García et al, , 2018. The straightforward comparison between the instantaneous and daily SWD, DIR and DIF simulations and measurements shows an excellent agreement (Fig.…”
Section: Quality Control (Qc)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Following the BSRN recommendations, the instantaneous clear-sky periods detected are simulated and compared with instantaneous and daily radiation measurements. The RTM model used is LibRadtran (http://www.libradtran.org, last access: 7 February 2019; Mayer and Kylling, 2005;Emde et al, 2016), which has been extensively tested at IZA (García et al, 2014(García et al, , 2018. The measured input parameters used in the LibRadtran model simulations are shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Quality Control (Qc)mentioning
confidence: 99%