Compensating Companies for Non-Pecuniary Damage: Comingersoll s.a. v Portugal and the Ambivalent Expansion of the Echr Scope

Emberland, Marius

doi:10.1093/bybil/74.1.409

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…209 Emberland has characterised this method of reasoning as relying on the Court's 'belief in the inevitable expansion of the Convention', and noted that this belief 'has the capacity … to prevail over profound disagreement within the Court as to the nature and purpose of ECHR protection.' 210 Although expanding the scope of Convention protection is not necessarily problematic, it is more likely to be where the beneficiaries are corporations rather than human beings. 211…”

Section: Conclusion: Cause For Concernmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights

Acheson

2018

Journal of Media Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Conclusion: Cause For Concernmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights

Acheson

2018

Journal of Media Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But it arguably has an "individual substratum". 58 On that assumption, what matters is that non-pecuniary damage has been inflicted on the natural persons behind or mediated by the legal entity. 59 The Court has itself justified such awards by pointing to the "company's reputation, uncertainty in decision-planning, disruption in the management of the company (for which there is no precise method of calculating the consequences) and lastly, albeit to a lesser degree, the anxiety and inconvenience caused to the members of the management team".…”

Section: The "Injured Party"mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights

Altwicker-Hámori

Altwicker

2015

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the first study to examine the awards made by the European Court of Human Rights in respect of non-pecuniary damage from an empirical perspective. It uses a multiple regression analysis based on data (929 observations) drawn from the Council of Europe's Human Rights Documentation database. We identified three elements of the "equity principle" used by the Court for the calculation of awards made in respect of nonpecuniary damage (seriousness of the violation, applicant-and overall context-related factors). Our empirical results show that there is a statistically significant association between the amount awarded in respect of nonpecuniary damage and the intensity of the violation, the existence of a separate opinion, the respondent state, and the fact whether the applicant is a legal or a natural person. Our study therefore contradicts the view voiced in the literature that awards made in respect of non-pecuniary damage under the ECHR are "unpredictable" and "inconsistent".

show abstract

Court of Justice of the European Union on Non-material Damage

Pavelek

Adamová²

2022

ČPVP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

V mnoha případech rozhoduje o náhradě nemajetkové újmy Evropský soudní dvůr. Na základě analýzy současné zavedené praxe SDEU v oblasti náhrady nemajetkové újmy si tento příspěvek klade za cíl nalézt odpovědi na následující otázky: jaká je koncepce a formy nemajetkové újmy v současné zavedené praxi SDEU, tj. v ESD a GC, a jaký význam má pro rozhodnutí SDEU, jaké jsou různé druhy nemajetkové újmy v zavedené praxi SDEU a jaké jsou jednotlivé regulační oblasti rozhodování o náhradě nemajetkové újmy. Následně budou formulovány východiska pro rozhodování o nemajetkové újmě, aby se dospělo k závěru, zda je možné na základě současných soudních rozhodnutí formulovat obecné zásady soudních řízení před SDEU ohledně náhrady nemajetkové újmy. Tento příspěvek by rád přispěl k diskusi o otázkách týkajících se problematiky odškodnění za nemateriální věci, jak je uvedeno v soudních rozhodnutích SDEU.

show abstract

Compensating Companies for Non-Pecuniary Damage: Comingersoll s.a. v Portugal and the Ambivalent Expansion of the Echr Scope

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Corporate reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights

Corporate reputation under the European Convention on Human Rights

Measuring Violations of Human Rights: An Empirical Analysis of Awards in Respect of Non-Pecuniary Damage Under the European Convention on Human Rights

Court of Justice of the European Union on Non-material Damage

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About