Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2638728.2641693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensation of head movements in mobile eye-tracking data using an inertial measurement unit

Abstract: Analysis of eye movements recorded with a mobile eye-tracker is difficult since the eye-tracking data are severely affected by simultaneous head and body movements. Automatic analysis methods developed for remote-, and tower-mounted eye-trackers do not take this into account and are therefore not suitable to use for data where also head-and body movements are present. As a result, data recorded with a mobile eye-tracker are often analyzed manually. In this work, we investigate how simultaneous recordings of ey… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need to detect fixations as early as possible therefore implies a detection method that uses more information than eye movement alone. Whether this is best done by compensating for head movements (Kinsman et al, 2012; Larsson et al, 2014) or by comparing the visual object at the gaze point as in the present study is an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The need to detect fixations as early as possible therefore implies a detection method that uses more information than eye movement alone. Whether this is best done by compensating for head movements (Kinsman et al, 2012; Larsson et al, 2014) or by comparing the visual object at the gaze point as in the present study is an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Kugler et al ( 2014 ) likely avoided these problems because the recording time was very short. In a similar manner, Larsson et al (2014) proposed the integration of a mobile eye tracking system with one inertial measurement unit (IMU) for head movement compensation in an indoor scenario, again avoiding the many problems of sensor drift in outdoor recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present a novel approach for tracking gaze relative to the heading direction while walking outdoors realized via a portable system comprised of a head mounted eye tracker and a pair of off-the-shelf motion sensors for head movement tracking. In contrast to the mobile tracking devices implemented by Kugler et al ( 2014 ) and Larsson et al ( 2014 ), which used only one motion sensor, we use a pair of motion sensors to address the problem of sensor drift that occurs during extended periods of outdoor recording. The system was designed to measure gaze and head scanning behaviors of visually impaired people as well as normally sighted people, and was tested on busy city streets in order to demonstrate its potential use for addressing the challenges in recording and analyzing human gaze patterns in outdoor environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual fixations of objects will result in small or nonsignificant rotation of the eyeball during stationary motion phases, see Figure 1 a. A rotation of the head during visual fixation of a stationary object however, will result in an opposite rotation of the eyeball due to the vestibo-ocular reflex, stabilizing the visual scenery [ 20 ], see Figure 1 b. The physiological relationship between head and eye rotations therefore represents a natural indicator for head rotation and can be used to support head orientation measurements.…”
Section: Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%