Whether, and to what extent, type 1 diabetes (T1D) affects the brains of children and adolescents has been debated for more than 30 years. Early studies found that children and adolescents with T1D were more likely to perform somewhat poorer than their healthy peers on tasks of mental efficiency that required rapid responses and sustained attention, as well as on measures of executive functioning that required problem-solving and planning (1). It was assumed, but not proven, that these betweengroup differences were a consequence of differences in brain integrity. Only when researchers began using MRI techniques was there unequivocal evidence that diabetes in childhood is accompanied by gross structural changes to the brain, including relative reductions in gray matter density in multiple cortical regions and microstructural abnormalities in major white matter tracts (2,3). Furthermore, these effects were most pronounced in those who developed diabetes early in life and were evident within 2-4 years of disease onset (4-7).One might expect that a significant loss of neurons, accompanied by axonal damage relatively early in life, would lead to increasingly serious cognitive impairment over time in people with diabetes. Interestingly, that does not appear to be the case. Cross-sectional studies of children and young adults with T1D do not show a significant worsening of performance with increasing age or disease duration (8), nor were marked declines in cognition seen in the adolescents and adults participating in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study, despite more than 25 years of follow-up (9). One possible compensatory mechanism that could protect brain function in children with T1D has now been identified by Sagger et al. (10), who in this issue describe the first evidence of increased functional connectivity measured using resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) within a series of neuronal networks.rsfMRI is a tool that is commonly used to assess the functional connections of the brain. It provides a measure of spontaneous brain activity forming spatially distinct networks, such as the default mode (monitoring internal and self-referential processes), attention, visual, and motor networks (11). Although this brain activity is unrelated to any task, it has been shown to be related to specific cognitive functions. Altered connectivity in adulthood has been associated with a number of diseases, including diabetes (12). Adult T1D patients with complications show decreased visual and motor network connectivity, whereas adult patients without complications show higher connectivity in such networks (13).rsfMRI data can be analyzed in a data-driven way, i.e., by allowing software to identify spatially distinct resting-state networks. A commonly used method is independent component analysis. Originally used to identify artifacts in data, this method has also proved to be a useful tool in the detection of resting-state networks (11). This pro...