2021
DOI: 10.1177/00472875211048930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compensatory Travel Post COVID-19: Cognitive and Emotional Effects of Risk Perception

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented and devastating impact on the travel and tourism industry worldwide. To sustain tourism organizations in the post-pandemic period, it is crucial to understand the factors that maintain, boost, or diminish the potential demands of international travel. With faith in the industry’s resilience, travel and tourism organizations are counting on the prospect of compensatory travel. However, little is known about the factors affecting potential demands and compensato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, this study initially extends and consummates the theory of protective travel behavior by advancing the intriguing emotion–value linkage. While protective travel behavior has garnered academic attention in the wake of COVID-19, existing research is predominantly centered on the emotional impacts on subsequent travel attitudes and behaviors ( Kim, Yang, et al, 2021 ; Rather, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ). Undoubtedly, emotions are the most salient and immediate responses of the threat stimulus, but the basis for attributing protective behaviors to emotions by direct causation appears untenable ( Baumeister et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, this study initially extends and consummates the theory of protective travel behavior by advancing the intriguing emotion–value linkage. While protective travel behavior has garnered academic attention in the wake of COVID-19, existing research is predominantly centered on the emotional impacts on subsequent travel attitudes and behaviors ( Kim, Yang, et al, 2021 ; Rather, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ). Undoubtedly, emotions are the most salient and immediate responses of the threat stimulus, but the basis for attributing protective behaviors to emotions by direct causation appears untenable ( Baumeister et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to PMT, the pandemic crisis inevitably evokes threat appraisals regarding the severity and vulnerability of related risks and available coping resources. The disproportional match of high inflection risk and unavailable remedies instigate emotional and affective responses to the situation, creating a state of tension ( Kim, Seo, & Choi, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ). Individuals’ affective experiences in this crisis are expected to be complicated as a result of the combination of different negative emotions ( Somma et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the pandemic, the opening of the borders and the relaxation of travel restrictions might create the feeling that people now have heightened control over their behaviors, which, in return, has resulted in revenge travel. Furthermore, having stayed indoors for a long time, pandemic-fatigued individuals are likely to develop a more positive attitude towards traveling [97].…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%