Compensatory word of mouth as symbolic self-completion

Abstract

Purpose When consumers experience a self-threat that calls their self-concept into question, the ensuing psychological discomfort motivates them to restore their self-perceptions on the threatened attribute. Although consumers can restore a threatened self-perception by consuming products and brands that possess the desired symbolic associations, this study aims to propose that word of mouth can serve to resolve self-threat and restore a threatened self-perception when the brand at the center of a word-of-mouth communication is symbolically congruent with the domain of the threat. Design/methodology/approach Experimental online survey research was conducted, inducing self-threat, manipulating brand and word-of-mouth conditions and measuring self-perceptions. Data for three studies were analyzed using SPSS and Hayes’ (2013) PROCESS macro. Findings Three studies show that spreading word of mouth can restore consumers’ threatened self-perceptions when the brand is symbolically congruent with the threat domain. Word of mouth about a symbolically congruent brand alleviates psychological discomfort, resulting in higher self-perceptions on the threatened attribute. The restorative effect is amplified for lower self-esteem consumers. Research limitations/implications Participants in the focal conditions were required to spread word of mouth, which may not be an organic response for all consumers; although not spreading word of mouth is ineffective, other compensatory consumer behavior options exist. The brand option was provided to participants, which allowed for control but may have reduced some of the realism. Practical implications Positioning brands to meet consumers’ psychological needs encourages the development of consumer–brand attachments. Brands that resonate with consumers reap the benefits of consumers’ active loyalty behaviors and enjoy stronger brand equity. The present research implies a new way consumers can form brand attachments: by spreading word of mouth to resolve self-threat. As many consumers post detailed, personal information online, this research suggests firms can align their brand messages with relevant identity-related discrepancies. Originality/value This research extends the symbolic self-completion compensatory consumption strategy to the word-of-mouth context, showing that consumers can achieve the same restorative effect as consumption by spreading word of mouth. This research also contributes to compensatory word-of-mouth literature by establishing the role of brand meaning.

Qualitative Study on Factors Influencing Aging Population’s Online Grocery Shopping and Mode Choice When Grocery Shopping in Person

“…It has been widely discussed that to win over new adherents for a service, promoters should focus on “word of mouth” strategies ( 42 , 43 ). However, building on the results from this study, “word of mouth” strategies are not likely to increase the use of online grocery services among the elderly since their peers are generally not interested in using them.…”

Too close for comfort? The impact of salesperson‐customer proximity on consumers' purchase behavior

“…Taken together, we predict that in the context of expressive consumption, greater salesperson‐customer proximity will produce feelings of psychological discomfort, which in turn will reduce store loyalty, purchase intentions, and actual spending. Indeed, space intrusions can be perceived as a self‐threat, which can induce discomfort and carry downstream consequences for consumption (Saenger et al, 2020; Thomas et al, 2017). Importantly, we predict that the negative impact of salesperson proximity will only emerge when identity relevance is salient.…”

Identity interplay: The importance and challenges of consumer research on multiple identities

“…Consider for example a consumer feeling "unathletic" after skipping a workout. She may compensate for this discrepancy directly by spending a longer time working out with a personal trainer on her next gym visit (Soo & Gal, 2014), or she may compensate symbolically (i.e., indirectly) through online word of mouth (Packard & Wooten, 2013;Saenger et al, 2020), social media posts , or purchasing athletic apparel (Rustagi & Shrum, 2015;Shalev & Morwitz, 2012;Ward & Broniarczyk, 2011). Both direct and symbolic behaviors would help reinforce an association between the self and the identity in the Multiple-Identity Network.…”