Compete with Creativity

Gaspersz, Jeff B.R.

doi:10.2139/ssrn.983934

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Most research on how to develop creativity has involved creative thinking techniques, for example brainstorming, attribute listing, and morphological analysis (Riquelme, 2000). These techniques are helpful in generating a large number of ideas in a short period of time, so that the chance of finding the golden idea increases (Gaspersz, 2005). Riquelme (2000), however, believes that these techniques are only effective when the problem is clearly defined.…”

Section: Creativity Within Organizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective

Klijn

Tomic

2010

Journal of Management Development

122

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The aim of this paper is to survey the main creativity models, mediators as well as the enhancers of organizational creativity, all from a psychological perspective. In addition, the paper seeks to identify gaps in knowledge of organizational creativity. Aspects of creativity that require closer inspection are described. Design/methodology/approach -A review of the literature on creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective was undertaken. A large number of research papers, mainly published after 1985 covering creativity and/or innovation, were identified and critically evaluated for relevance to the paper's purpose, and were judged on sufficient scholarship in order to create a narrative literature review. Findings -Despite the great amount of psychological research on creativity and innovation, only a few models and theories appear to be defined. Moreover, their predictive value and incorporation of possible influencing factors is limited. In general, it can be concluded that the field of creativity requires more in-depth research as well as a synthesis of results of various studies and models in order to effectively develop, promote and predict creativity within organizations. Research limitations/implications -The review focuses mainly on psychological aspects of creativity in organizations as published in research papers. In future studies for determining generic theories and conclusions, other aspects, e.g. sociological, cultural, economic and biological, should be taken into account. Originality/value -A large and diverse number of studies on creativity in organizations have been conducted, but a comprehensive review paper on organizational creativity is still lacking. This paper supplies this need for survey. The findings of the current paper provide a well documented framework in addressing creativity enhancers in organizational environments. Furthermore, it articulates suggestions for further research and can be a good starting-point for newcomers in this research domain.

show abstract

Section: Creativity Within Organizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A common definition of innovation is: the successful implementation of creative ideas (Gaspersz, 2005;Wood, 2003;Woodman et al, 1993). Creativity is therefore seen as the cornerstone of innovation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective

Klijn

Tomic

2010

Journal of Management Development

122

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pembuatan lubang bor dan pengumpulan getah pada setiap pohon dilakukan sebanyak 10 kali, sehingga jumlah hasil getah yang dikumpulkan sebanyak 900 kantong. Model statistik untuk percobaan faktorial yang terdiri dari dua faktor dengan menggunakan rancangan dasar RAL (Gaspersz, 1991) …”

Section: Rancangan Percobaanunclassified

“…Apabila terdapat perbedaan diantara perlakuan, F > F analisis hitung tabel dilanjutkan dengan uji beda nyata jujur (HSD, Honestly Significant Difference Test) (Gaspersz, 1991).…”

Section: Analisis Dataunclassified

Studi Penyadapan Getah Pinus Cara Bor Dengan Stimulan H2so4

Lempang

2017

j.penelit.has.kehutan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In general, pine resin yield is affected by various factors i.e. pine tree species, growing environment and tapping method. This paper studies pine resin tapping yield by drilling method using H SO stimulant. Tapping point is designed in the depth ABSTRAKSecara umum, produksi getah pinus dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, yaitu jenis pohon pinus, lingkungan pertumbuhan, dan cara penyadapan getah. Tulisan ini mempelajari produksi getah pinus yang disadap dengan cara dibor dan menggunakan stimulan H SO . Lubang sadap dirancang dengan dilaburkan pada luka sadap dengan pengulangan perlakuan 10 kali. Penelitian dirancang menggunakan percobaan faktorial 3 x 3 dengan rancangan acak lengkap dan uji lanjutan uji beda nyata jujur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyadapan getah pinus dengan cara dibor dan penambahan stimulan H SO menghasilkan getah pinus antara 15,5-109,3 g/pohon/pungut (rata-rata 56,3 g/pohon/pungut) 2 4atau antara 2,6-18,2 g/pohon/hari (rata-rata 9,4 g/pohon/hari). Hasil getah pinus dipengaruhi secara nyata oleh kedalaman lubang sadap dan konsentrasi stimulan H SO . Semakin dalam lubang sadap, produksi getah pinus sebesar 56,45%. Produksi getah terbanyak diperoleh dari titik sadap 8 cm dengan 30% H SO dengan hasil getah rata-rata 90,7 g/pohon/pungut.

show abstract

“…To sustain the growth, it needs a trigger to boost the competitiveness based on work productivity. Quality is everything that satisfies the customer and fits the requirements [2]. Product quality is the key to win the market competition, because it can earn the customer's trust to the product offered by the company, then in the end it will lead to customer loyalty.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Production quality improvement analysis of grey cambric using Six Sigma Method

Shafira

Mansur

2018

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Quality has an important role in business. A good quality means it is able to meet the required standards. The concept of quality must be comprehensive, whether the quality of the product or its process. PT Textile Yogyakarta is still having a high rate of defect products. The Waste Assessment Model (WAM) was used to identify the wastes that frequently occur by scoring each type of waste. The results show the waste rank are defect 26.12%, inventory 20.36%, motion 15.26%, transportation 14.51%, over production 12.91%, waiting 7.17%, and process 3.67%. While using the Six Sigma from the 4 CTQ process, the result of sigma level is 3.3. It means that the sigma level of PT Textile Yogyakarta is still under the average sigma level in Japan which is 5 Sigma. As for the improvement part, FMEA AHP was used and the results show that the first rank is the uncleaned woof residue, the second rank is the uncut thread which has an RPN value of 8.04 that was caused when the operator did not clean the machine from the woof residue, and the third rank is the malfunctioned machine which has an RPN value of 7.32 that was caused by broken kleting.

show abstract

Compete with Creativity

Cited by 10 publications

References 2 publications

A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective

A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective

Studi Penyadapan Getah Pinus Cara Bor Dengan Stimulan H2so4

Production quality improvement analysis of grey cambric using Six Sigma Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About