2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36617-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competence Measurement and Informatics Standards in Secondary Education

Abstract: Abstract. As a result of the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) the development and assessment of educational standards became a high level objective in the German educational system. Following this tendency the German Informatics Society (GI) in 2008 published educational standards of informatics for lower secondary education that describe minimal informatics requirements for high school students. Up until now, no coherent competence model for the standards exists, but it is essential as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Essential for such competence measurements and for the comparability of the results are models that define measurable variables in connection with the (diverse) competence goals to be achieved. In such models, a distinction is usually at least made between subjectspecific and methodological competence goals, or even such models are developed subjectspecifically (see for example Clear et al, 2020;Magenheim et al, 2013;Pasternak or Hellmig, & Röhner, 2018 in the field of Computer Science). Similar approaches for higher education are still less popular or fail due to the lack of participation of the many different actors, or a conventional (sometimes contradicting) understanding of freedom of teaching, or a lack of uniform educational plans and competence goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essential for such competence measurements and for the comparability of the results are models that define measurable variables in connection with the (diverse) competence goals to be achieved. In such models, a distinction is usually at least made between subjectspecific and methodological competence goals, or even such models are developed subjectspecifically (see for example Clear et al, 2020;Magenheim et al, 2013;Pasternak or Hellmig, & Röhner, 2018 in the field of Computer Science). Similar approaches for higher education are still less popular or fail due to the lack of participation of the many different actors, or a conventional (sometimes contradicting) understanding of freedom of teaching, or a lack of uniform educational plans and competence goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%