2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competency assessment of residents in surgical pathology using virtual microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Doctor Fred Dee, at the University of Iowa, has 2 contributed articles in this Telepathology Symposium on the topics of education and testing [18,30]. From our perspective, Dr Dee has been our National Library of Medicine's "go-to person" for conceptualizing, developing, evaluating, manufacturing, and hosting public teaching sets of virtual pathology slides for years.…”
Section: Virtual Microscopy In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Doctor Fred Dee, at the University of Iowa, has 2 contributed articles in this Telepathology Symposium on the topics of education and testing [18,30]. From our perspective, Dr Dee has been our National Library of Medicine's "go-to person" for conceptualizing, developing, evaluating, manufacturing, and hosting public teaching sets of virtual pathology slides for years.…”
Section: Virtual Microscopy In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article by Bruch et al [30], describes a promising new application of virtual microscopy in pathology resident training. The study may seem modest at first reading but, upon closer examination, it is elegant and even groundbreaking.…”
Section: Virtual Microscopy In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have started to build multiple choice pre-and post-tests linking to material within the virtual slide set for individual self-assessment but would like to pursue formal competency assessment using more sophisticated interfaces. Although virtual microscopy coupled with a testing interface can reliably assess resident performance and morphologic skill [10], the diagnostic process itself is also critical. Whether or not the trainee is able to generate a logical differential diagnosis and knows the most appropriate tests which would distinguish between the different entities is difficult to evaluate in our current testing format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers also positively evaluate WSI because, although there is initially a significant increase in the time related to the preparation of the material, in the end it results in a significant reduction in the time spent in the preparation of the lessons [19,35]. WSI provides a more complete approach to the cases by adding clinical information, radiological imaging, macroscopic images, immunohistochemical stains and molecular data to the virtual histological images [33,36]. This can more accurately simulate the actual diagnostic practice and seems to be associated with better final results.…”
Section: Wsi In Undergraduate Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSI is well evaluated by residents in the studies, although the final results comparing abilities reached with WSI and CLM differ from one study to another [43,44,45]. The presence of clinical and radiological information and previous practice using WSI seem to influence the results [36]. …”
Section: Wsi In Postgraduate Training (Residency and Fellowship Progrmentioning
confidence: 99%