2003
DOI: 10.1506/5k7c-yt1h-0g32-90k0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Competency‐Based Education and Assessment for the Accounting Profession: A Critical Review*

Abstract: In recent years many professional accounting associations have become interested in establishing competency‐based professional requirements and assessment methods for certifying accounting professionals. A competency‐based approach to qualification specifies expectations in terms of outcomes, or what an individual can accomplish, rather than in terms of an individual's knowledge or capabilities. This idea has an obvious appeal to many practitioners and administrators of professional qualification programs. How… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eraut (1994) further articulates that in many cases, performance evidence collected via direct observation in the work-place may be the most valid method of assessing competence and sometimes, the only option. Indeed, this view is also supported by Boritz and Carnaghan (2003) who suggest that the work-place is the most appropriate forum for the assessment of competence. This is further articulated by Lines and Gammie (2004) who posit that many of the required competences identified by IFAC in their education standards (IFAC, 2003a) cannot be effectively 1 The backwash effect of assessment suggests that the assessment drives both the teaching and learning, therefore if the assessment instruments remain very traditional then the teaching and learning processes will not develop.…”
Section: Assessment Methods and Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Eraut (1994) further articulates that in many cases, performance evidence collected via direct observation in the work-place may be the most valid method of assessing competence and sometimes, the only option. Indeed, this view is also supported by Boritz and Carnaghan (2003) who suggest that the work-place is the most appropriate forum for the assessment of competence. This is further articulated by Lines and Gammie (2004) who posit that many of the required competences identified by IFAC in their education standards (IFAC, 2003a) cannot be effectively 1 The backwash effect of assessment suggests that the assessment drives both the teaching and learning, therefore if the assessment instruments remain very traditional then the teaching and learning processes will not develop.…”
Section: Assessment Methods and Sources Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 82%
“…It is this stage, which seems to result in the many variations of competency models, (Hyland, 1994;Hagar and Gonczi, 2002;Boritz and Carnaghan, 2003) although there are essentially two extremes: the functional analysis method and the capability method.…”
Section: Functional Analysis Versus Capability Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations